195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2415440)
21. The obviously ill patient in need of treatment: a fourth standard for civil commitment.
Treffert DA
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Mar; 36(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 3979975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Screening services in civil commitment of the mentally ill: an attempt to balance individual liberties with needs for treatment.
Aviram U
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(2):195-211. PubMed ID: 8364237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Civil commitment in Turkey: reflections on a bill drafted by psychiatrists.
Arikan R; Appelbaum PS; Sercan M; Turkcan S; Satmis N; Polat A
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2007; 30(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 16844221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Continuing case law development in the right to refuse treatment.
Mills MJ; Yesavage JA; Gutheil TG
Am J Psychiatry; 1983 Jun; 140(6):715-9. PubMed ID: 6846630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Historical development of legal protection for the rights of mentally ill persons in France.
Thoret Y; Kantin S
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1994 Dec; 45(12):1211-4. PubMed ID: 7868104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Legislation concerning patients' rights in Israel and in Britain.
Levy A; Davidson S
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1986; 23(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 3804693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Why the gap? Practice and policy in civil commitment hearings.
Turkheimer E; Parry CD
Am Psychol; 1992 May; 47(5):646-55. PubMed ID: 1642374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. States move to ease law committing mentally ill.
Goleman D
N Y Times Web; 1986 Dec; ():C1, C4. PubMed ID: 11647825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The new Russian law on psychiatric care.
Kinsey D
Perspect Psychiatr Care; 1994; 30(2):15-9. PubMed ID: 7862505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Advocacy and the mentally ill.
Willetts R
Soc Work; 1980 Sep; 25(5):372-7. PubMed ID: 10248421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Criminal justice procedures in civil commitment.
Slovenko R
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1977 Nov; 28(11):817-26. PubMed ID: 914239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Law, rights, and psychiatry in the People's Republic of China.
Pearson V
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1992; 15(4):409-23. PubMed ID: 1428424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Key provisions of APA's model law.
Appelbaum PS
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Sep; 36(9):967-8. PubMed ID: 4065855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Are confinement and treatment synonyms?
Becker D; Gonen N; Floru S
Med Law; 1990; 9(3):904-9. PubMed ID: 2122159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Civil commitment: is the pendulum changing direction?
Appelbaum PS
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Sep; 33(9):703-4. PubMed ID: 7129383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The Council on Psychiatry and Law.
Roth LH
Am J Psychiatry; 1986 Mar; 143(3):412-3. PubMed ID: 11643912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. England's new commitment law.
Appelbaum PS
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1985 Jul; 36(7):705-6, 713. PubMed ID: 4018744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. When treatment becomes coercion: a legal perspective.
Einhorn AH
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1980; 347():199-208. PubMed ID: 6930899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. How flexible are our civil commitment statutes?
Fisher WH; Pierce GL; Appelbaum PS
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1988 Jul; 39(7):711-2. PubMed ID: 3402934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Civil commitment of mentally ill patients: developments in Flanders].
Nys H; Vandenberghe J
Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2008; 50 Spec no.():55-60. PubMed ID: 19067301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
