These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24155948)

  • 21. The influence of male and female body size on copulation duration and fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lefranc A; Bundgaard J
    Hereditas; 2000; 132(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 11075519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evolution of reduced post-copulatory molecular interactions in Drosophila populations lacking sperm competition.
    Hollis B; Houle D; Kawecki TJ
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jan; 29(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 26395588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Selection on heritable social network positions is context-dependent in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Wice EW; Saltz JB
    Nat Commun; 2021 Jun; 12(1):3357. PubMed ID: 34099680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. I. Male courtship song, mating success, and genotype x environment interactions.
    Etges WJ; de Oliveira CC; Gragg E; Ortíz-Barrientos D; Noor MA; Ritchie MG
    Evolution; 2007 May; 61(5):1106-19. PubMed ID: 17492965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Male attractiveness is subjective to exposure to males of different attractiveness in fruit flies.
    Poissonnier LA; Danchin E; Isabel G
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):16463. PubMed ID: 39014083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantitative genetics of natural variation of behavior in Drosophila melanogaster: the possible role of the social environment on creating persistent patterns of group activity.
    Higgins LA; Jones KM; Wayne ML
    Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1529-39. PubMed ID: 16153038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system.
    Orteiza N; Linder JE; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Sep; 18(5):1315-23. PubMed ID: 16135126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Natural genetic variation in social environment choice: context-dependent gene-environment correlation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Saltz JB
    Evolution; 2011 Aug; 65(8):2325-34. PubMed ID: 21790578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Artificial selection on sexual aggression: Correlated traits and possible trade-offs.
    Dukas R; Yan JL; Scott AM; Sivaratnam S; Baxter CM
    Evolution; 2020 Jun; 74(6):1112-1123. PubMed ID: 32372455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.
    Jennions MD; Petrie M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2000 Feb; 75(1):21-64. PubMed ID: 10740892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How sexual selection can drive the evolution of costly sperm ornamentation.
    Lüpold S; Manier MK; Puniamoorthy N; Schoff C; Starmer WT; Luepold SH; Belote JM; Pitnick S
    Nature; 2016 May; 533(7604):535-8. PubMed ID: 27225128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Differential effects of male nutrient balance on pre- and post-copulatory traits, and consequences for female reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Morimoto J; Wigby S
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27673. PubMed ID: 27270223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Male genotype influences female reproductive investment in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Pischedda A; Stewart AD; Little MK; Rice WR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Jul; 278(1715):2165-72. PubMed ID: 21159677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The genetic architecture of fitness in a seed beetle: assessing the potential for indirect genetic benefits of female choice.
    Bilde T; Friberg U; Maklakov AA; Fry JD; Arnqvist G
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Oct; 8():295. PubMed ID: 18950531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Female mate choice predicts paternity success in the absence of additive genetic variance for other female paternity bias mechanisms in Drosophila serrata.
    Collet JM; Blows MW
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Nov; 27(11):2568-72. PubMed ID: 25290296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The deleterious effects of high inbreeding on male Drosophila melanogaster attractiveness are observed under competitive but not under non-competitive conditions.
    Valtonen TM; Roff DA; Rantala MJ
    Behav Genet; 2014 Mar; 44(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 24413901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quantitative genetic analysis of courtship and reproduction in female Drosophila melanogaster.
    Gromko MH
    Heredity (Edinb); 1989 Apr; 62 ( Pt 2)():251-5. PubMed ID: 2498236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Drosophila melanogaster females change mating behaviour and offspring production based on social context.
    Billeter JC; Jagadeesh S; Stepek N; Azanchi R; Levine JD
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Jun; 279(1737):2417-25. PubMed ID: 22298851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The cost of mating rises nonlinearly with copulation frequency in a laboratory population of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Kuijper B; Stewart AD; Rice WR
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Nov; 19(6):1795-802. PubMed ID: 17040376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.