619 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24156748)
1. Activated carbon mitigates mercury and methylmercury bioavailability in contaminated sediments.
Gilmour CC; Riedel GS; Riedel G; Kwon S; Landis R; Brown SS; Menzie CA; Ghosh U
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Nov; 47(22):13001-10. PubMed ID: 24156748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mercury remediation in wetland sediment using zero-valent iron and granular activated carbon.
Lewis AS; Huntington TG; Marvin-DiPasquale MC; Amirbahman A
Environ Pollut; 2016 May; 212():366-373. PubMed ID: 26874318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of biochars and activated carbons for in situ remediation of sediments impacted with organics, mercury, and methylmercury.
Gomez-Eyles JL; Yupanqui C; Beckingham B; Riedel G; Gilmour C; Ghosh U
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Dec; 47(23):13721-9. PubMed ID: 24168448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of a Novel Equilibrium Passive Sampling Device for Methylmercury in Sediment and Soil Porewaters.
Sanders JP; McBurney A; Gilmour CC; Schwartz GE; Washburn S; Kane Driscoll SB; Brown SS; Ghosh U
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2020 Feb; 39(2):323-334. PubMed ID: 31692059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Activated Carbon and Biochar Reduce Mercury Methylation Potentials in Aquatic Sediments.
Bussan DD; Sessums RF; Cizdziel JV
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2016 Apr; 96(4):536-9. PubMed ID: 26779648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Horizontal and vertical variability of mercury species in pore water and sediments in small lakes in Ontario.
He T; Lu J; Yang F; Feng X
Sci Total Environ; 2007 Nov; 386(1-3):53-64. PubMed ID: 17720225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of sorbent amendments for in situ remediation of metal-contaminated sediments.
Kwon S; Thomas J; Reed BE; Levine L; Magar VS; Farrar D; Bridges TS; Ghosh U
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2010 Sep; 29(9):1883-92. PubMed ID: 20821645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of dissolved organic matter on mercury and methylmercury sorption to activated carbon in soils: implications for remediation.
Schwartz GE; Sanders JP; McBurney AM; Brown SS; Ghosh U; Gilmour CC
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2019 Mar; 21(3):485-496. PubMed ID: 30724289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Environmental assessment of mercury dispersion, transformation and bioavailability in the Lake Victoria Goldfields, Tanzania.
Ikingura JR; Akagi H; Mujumba J; Messo C
J Environ Manage; 2006 Oct; 81(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 16782263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mercury alkylation in freshwater sediments from Scottish canals.
Cavoura O; Brombach CC; Cortis R; Davidson CM; Gajdosechova Z; Keenan HE; Krupp EM
Chemosphere; 2017 Sep; 183():27-35. PubMed ID: 28531556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Net methylmercury production as a basis for improved risk assessment of mercury-contaminated sediments.
Skyllberg U; Drott A; Lambertsson L; Björn E; Karlsson T; Johnson T; Heinemo SA; Holmström H
Ambio; 2007 Sep; 36(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 17985697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effect of Sediments on Bioaccumulation of Mercury in Fish Body in the Water-Level-Fluctuating Zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area].
Sun S; Li CX; Zhang C; Wang YM; Wang DY
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2017 Apr; 38(4):1689-1696. PubMed ID: 29965175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differentiated availability of geochemical mercury pools controls methylmercury levels in estuarine sediment and biota.
Jonsson S; Skyllberg U; Nilsson MB; Lundberg E; Andersson A; Björn E
Nat Commun; 2014 Aug; 5():4624. PubMed ID: 25140406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Net methylmercury production in 2 contrasting stream sediments and associated accumulation and toxicity to periphyton.
Klaus JE; Hammerschmidt CR; Costello DM; Burton GA
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Jul; 35(7):1759-65. PubMed ID: 26636557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Distribution and availability of mercury and methylmercury in different waters from the Rio Madeira Basin, Amazon.
Vieira M; Bernardi JVE; Dórea JG; Rocha BCP; Ribeiro R; Zara LF
Environ Pollut; 2018 Apr; 235():771-779. PubMed ID: 29351888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of a submerged meadow on uptake and trophic transfer of legacy mercury from contaminated sediment in the food web in a brackish Norwegian fjord.
Olsen M; Fjeld E; Lydersen E
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 654():209-217. PubMed ID: 30445322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In-situ subaqueous capping of mercury-contaminated sediments in a fresh-water aquatic system, Part I-Bench-scale microcosm study to assess methylmercury production.
Randall PM; Fimmen R; Lal V; Darlington R
Environ Res; 2013 Aug; 125():30-40. PubMed ID: 23768845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of aquaculture on mercury distribution, changing speciation, and bioaccumulation in a reservoir ecosystem.
Liang P; Feng X; You Q; Gao X; Xu J; Wong M; Christie P; Wu SC
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Nov; 24(33):25923-25932. PubMed ID: 28940142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduction in mercury bioavailability to Asian clams (Corbicula fluminea) and changes in bacterial communities in sediments with activated carbon amendment.
Bailon MX; Park M; Solis KL; Na Y; Chaudhary DK; Kim S; Hong Y
Chemosphere; 2022 Mar; 291(Pt 1):132700. PubMed ID: 34710454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mercury distribution and methylmercury mobility in the sediments of three sites on the Lebanese coast, eastern Mediterranean.
Abi-Ghanem C; Nakhlé K; Khalaf G; Cossa D
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011 Apr; 60(3):394-405. PubMed ID: 20625711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
