These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24156775)
1. Performance of blood glucose meters in compliance with current and future clinical ISO15197 accuracy criteria. Pfützner A; Hengesbach C; Demircik F; Schipper C; Forst T; Musholt PB Curr Med Res Opin; 2014 Feb; 30(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 24156775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices. Pfützner A; Mitri M; Musholt PB; Sachsenheimer D; Borchert M; Yap A; Forst T Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Apr; 28(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 22435798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. System Accuracy Evaluation of Four Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Following ISO 15197 Using a Glucose Oxidase and a Hexokinase-Based Comparison Method. Link M; Schmid C; Pleus S; Baumstark A; Rittmeyer D; Haug C; Freckmann G J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 9(5):1041-50. PubMed ID: 25872967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects. Tack C; Pohlmeier H; Behnke T; Schmid V; Grenningloh M; Forst T; Pfützner A Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Apr; 14(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 22176154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The accuracy evaluation of four blood glucose monitoring systems according to ISO 15197:2003 and ISO 15197:2013 criteria. Chen H; Yao Q; Dong Y; Tang Z; Li R; Cai B; Wang R; Chen Q Prim Care Diabetes; 2019 Jun; 13(3):252-258. PubMed ID: 30770203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A glucose meter accuracy and precision comparison: the FreeStyle Flash Versus the Accu-Chek Advantage, Accu-Chek Compact Plus, Ascensia Contour, and the BD Logic. Thomas LE; Kane MP; Bakst G; Busch RS; Hamilton RA; Abelseth JM Diabetes Technol Ther; 2008 Apr; 10(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 18260773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. System accuracy evaluation of 27 blood glucose monitoring systems according to DIN EN ISO 15197. Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Zschornack E; Kocher S; Tshiananga J; Heister F; Haug C Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Mar; 12(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 20151773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. System accuracy evaluation of 18 CE-marked current-generation blood glucose monitoring systems based on EN ISO 15197:2015. Pleus S; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Mende J; Link M; Zschornack E; Haug C; Freckmann G BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care; 2020 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 31958308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting. Klaff LJ; Brazg R; Hughes K; Tideman AM; Schachner HC; Stenger P; Pardo S; Dunne N; Parkes JL Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Jan; 17(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 25260047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hematocrit interference of blood glucose meters for patient self-measurement. Ramljak S; Lock JP; Schipper C; Musholt PB; Forst T; Lyon M; Pfützner A J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Jan; 7(1):179-89. PubMed ID: 23439176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in the Hands of Intended Users and Trained Personnel Based on ISO 15197 Requirements. Freckmann G; Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Rittmeyer D; Pleus S; Haug C Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Apr; 19(4):246-254. PubMed ID: 28225633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Accuracy of Six Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems and Modeling of Possibly Related Insulin Dosing Errors. Baumstark A; Jendrike N; Pleus S; Haug C; Freckmann G Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Oct; 19(10):580-588. PubMed ID: 28704063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of simulated altitude on blood glucose meter performance: implications for in-flight blood glucose monitoring. Olateju T; Begley J; Flanagan D; Kerr D J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 6(4):867-74. PubMed ID: 22920813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of hematocrit interference with MyStar extra and seven competitive devices. Demircik F; Ramljak S; Hermanns I; Pfützner A; Pfützner A J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Mar; 9(2):262-7. PubMed ID: 25549636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the effects of insufficient blood volume samples on the performance of blood glucose self-test meters. Pfützner A; Schipper C; Ramljak S; Flacke F; Sieber J; Forst T; Musholt PB J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Nov; 7(6):1522-9. PubMed ID: 24351178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. System Accuracy Assessment of a Blood Glucose Meter With Wireless Internet Access Associated With Unusual Hypoglycemia Patterns in Clinical Trials. Pfützner A; Demircik F; Kirsch V; Pfützner J; Strobl S; Hanna M; Spatz J; Pfützner AH J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2019 May; 13(3):507-513. PubMed ID: 30974985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. System Accuracy Assessment of a Combined Invasive and Noninvasive Glucometer. Pfützner A; Demircik F; Pfützner J; Kessler K; Strobl S; Spatz J; Pfützner AH; Lier A J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 May; 14(3):575-581. PubMed ID: 31640424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Five Blood Glucose Systems in the Hypo-, Eu-, and Hyperglycemic Range. Zijlstra E; Heinemann L; Fischer A; Kapitza C J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 10(6):1316-1323. PubMed ID: 27605592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comprehensive evaluation of strip performance in multiple blood glucose monitoring systems. Katz LB; Macleod K; Grady M; Cameron H; Pfützner A; Setford S Expert Rev Med Devices; 2015 May; 12(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 25702769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]