These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24156950)

  • 1. Tight ceramic UF membrane as RO pre-treatment: the role of electrostatic interactions on phosphate rejection.
    Shang R; Verliefde AR; Hu J; Zeng Z; Lu J; Kemperman AJ; Deng H; Nijmeijer K; Heijman SG; Rietveld LC
    Water Res; 2014 Jan; 48():498-507. PubMed ID: 24156950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
    Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J
    Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes.
    Yoon J; Amy G; Chung J; Sohn J; Yoon Y
    Chemosphere; 2009 Sep; 77(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 19679331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fouling of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration membranes by protein mixtures: the role of inter-foulant-species interaction.
    Wang YN; Tang CY
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Aug; 45(15):6373-9. PubMed ID: 21678956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adsorption combined with ultrafiltration to remove organic matter from seawater.
    Tansakul C; Laborie S; Cabassud C
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(19):6362-70. PubMed ID: 21996607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of surfactant modified ultrafiltration for perchlorate (Cl(O)(4-)) removal.
    Yoon J; Yoon Y; Amy G; Cho J; Foss D; Kim TH
    Water Res; 2003 May; 37(9):2001-12. PubMed ID: 12691884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane.
    Valladares Linares R; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Li Z; Amy G
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(20):6737-44. PubMed ID: 22055122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polydopamine coating effects on ultrafiltration membrane to enhance power density and mitigate biofouling of ultrafiltration microbial fuel cells (UF-MFCs).
    Kim KY; Yang E; Lee MY; Chae KJ; Kim CM; Kim IS
    Water Res; 2014 May; 54():62-8. PubMed ID: 24561270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of humic acid rejection and flux decline during filtration with negatively charged and uncharged ultrafiltration membranes.
    Shao J; Hou J; Song H
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):473-82. PubMed ID: 20863548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reverse osmosis membrane rejection for ersatz space mission wastewaters.
    Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
    Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3298-308. PubMed ID: 16005043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ultrafiltration significantly increased the scaling potential of municipal secondary effluent on reverse osmosis membranes.
    Tong X; Zhang ZW; Wu YH; Bai Y; Ikuno N; Ishii K; Hu HY
    Water Res; 2022 Jul; 220():118672. PubMed ID: 35635920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Treatment of dairy wastewater by two-stage membrane operation with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration.
    Gong YW; Zhang HX; Cheng XN
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(5):915-9. PubMed ID: 22339027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Removal of haloacetic acids from swimming pool water by reverse osmosis and nanofiltration.
    Yang L; She Q; Wan MP; Wang R; Chang VW; Tang CY
    Water Res; 2017 Jun; 116():116-125. PubMed ID: 28324708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recovery of small dye molecules from aqueous solutions using charged ultrafiltration membranes.
    Chen X; Zhao Y; Moutinho J; Shao J; Zydney AL; He Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2015 Mar; 284():58-64. PubMed ID: 25463218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of coagulation on fouling potential and removal of algal organic matter in ultrafiltration pretreatment to seawater reverse osmosis.
    Alizadeh Tabatabai SA; Schippers JC; Kennedy MD
    Water Res; 2014 Aug; 59():283-94. PubMed ID: 24810744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
    Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Removal of model dyes on charged UF membranes: Experiment and simulation.
    Ding J; Pu L; Zou D; Cao M; Shan C; Zhang Q; Gao G; Pan B
    Chemosphere; 2020 Feb; 240():124940. PubMed ID: 31574446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
    D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Candida krusei is the major contaminant of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membranes used for cranberry juice production.
    Fikri S; Lessard MH; Perreault V; Doyen A; Labrie S
    Food Microbiol; 2023 Feb; 109():104146. PubMed ID: 36309445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feasibility of supercritical CO₂ treatment for controlling biofouling in the reverse osmosis process.
    Mun S; Baek Y; Kim C; Lee YW; Yoon J
    Biofouling; 2012; 28(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 22726211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.