These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24156987)

  • 1. Safety and acceptability of tubal ligation procedures performed by trained clinical officers in rural Uganda.
    Gordon-Maclean C; Nantayi LK; Quinn H; Ngo TD
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jan; 124(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 24156987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimizing tubal ligation service delivery: a prospective cohort study to measure the task-sharing experience of Marie Stopes International Ethiopia.
    Nuccio O; Sendek B; Park MH; Mesele T; Okello FO; Gordon-Maclean C
    Health Policy Plan; 2017 Mar; 32(2):163-169. PubMed ID: 28207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety of tubal ligation by minilaparotomy provided by clinical officers versus assistant medical officers: study protocol for a noninferiority randomized controlled trial in Tanzanian women.
    Barone MA; Mbuguni Z; Achola JO; Cordero C; Kanama J; Muganyizi PS; Mwanga J; Shannon C; Tibyehabwa L
    Trials; 2017 Oct; 18(1):499. PubMed ID: 29073928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety of Tubal Occlusion by Minilaparotomy Provided by Trained Clinical Officers Versus Assistant Medical Officers in Tanzania: A Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial.
    Barone MA; Mbuguni Z; Achola JO; Almeida A; Cordero C; Kanama J; Marquina A; Muganyizi P; Mwanga J; Ouma D; Shannon C; Tibyehabwa L
    Glob Health Sci Pract; 2018 Oct; 6(3):484-499. PubMed ID: 30120168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The safety, efficacy and acceptability of task sharing tubal sterilization to midlevel providers: a systematic review.
    Rodriguez MI; Gordon-Maclean C
    Contraception; 2014 Jun; 89(6):504-11. PubMed ID: 24560482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Urban-Rural Differences in Tubal Ligation Incidence in the State of Georgia, USA.
    Travers CD; Spencer JB; Cwiak CA; Mertens AC; Howards PP
    J Rural Health; 2018 Mar; 34(2):122-131. PubMed ID: 28731204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical and psychological repercussions of videolaparoscopic tubal ligation: observational, single cohort, retrospective study.
    Dias DS; Dias R; Nahás-Neto J; Nahás EA; Leite NJ; Bueloni-Dias FN; Modotti WP
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2014 Dec; 132(6):321-31. PubMed ID: 25351752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Female sterilization by tubal ligation at caesarean section in Makurdi, Nigeria.
    Swende TZ; Hwande TS
    Ann Afr Med; 2010; 9(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 20935426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characteristics of family planning clients in Bangladesh.
    Swenson I; Khan AR
    Int J Fertil; 1983; 28(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 6140233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acceptability of levonorgestrel subdermal implants versus tubal ligation for long-term contraception in a rural population of Zimbabwe.
    Mitchel MJ; Thistle P
    Contraception; 2004 Dec; 70(6):483-6. PubMed ID: 15541410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tubal sterilization: pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic versus laparoscopic sterilization in France, 2006-2010.
    Fernandez H; Legendre G; Blein C; Lamarsalle L; Panel P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Sep; 180():133-7. PubMed ID: 24993770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical cytology screening after tubal ligation.
    Cohen MM; Roos NP
    Am J Prev Med; 1986; 2(4):220-5. PubMed ID: 3453184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Getting closer to people: family planning provision by drug shops in Uganda.
    Akol A; Chin-Quee D; Wamala-Mucheri P; Namwebya JH; Mercer SJ; Stanback J
    Glob Health Sci Pract; 2014 Nov; 2(4):472-81. PubMed ID: 25611480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of tubal ligation among American women.
    Warehime MN; Bass L; Pedulla D
    J Reprod Med; 2007 Apr; 52(4):263-72. PubMed ID: 17506364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are sexual problems more common in women who have had a tubal ligation? A population-based study of Australian women.
    Smith A; Lyons A; Ferris J; Richters J; Pitts M; Shelley J
    BJOG; 2010 Mar; 117(4):463-8. PubMed ID: 20074263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation removes obstacles to sterilization in Brazil.
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1985; 5(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 12314001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Female surgical sterilization at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi.
    Bhutta SZ; Zaeem S; Korejo R
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2004; 16(2):42-5. PubMed ID: 15455616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of tubal ligation on the incidence of epithelial cancer of the ovary.
    Koch M; Starreveld AA; Hill GB; Jenkins H
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1984; 7(4):241-5. PubMed ID: 6488215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Color doppler flow analysis of uterine and ovarian arteries before and after tubal sterilization: electrocautery versus pomeroy.
    Dede FS; Akyuz O; Dilbaz B; Caliskan E; Haberal A
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2006; 61(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 16192732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Controversy on the method of sterilization during cesarean section: tubal ligation or hysterectomy? Review of the literature].
    Kouam L; Kamdom-moyo J; Doh A; Ngassa P; Shasha W
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1994 Mar; 22(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 12319658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.