BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24157437)

  • 1. Listener expectations and gender bias in nonsibilant fricative perception.
    Babel M; McGuire G
    Phonetica; 2013; 70(1-2):117-51. PubMed ID: 24157437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the sufficiency of compound target specification of isolated vowels and vowels in /bVb/ syllables.
    Andruski JE; Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):390-410. PubMed ID: 1737887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of relative amplitude of frication on perception of place of articulation.
    Hedrick MS; Ohde RN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):2005-26. PubMed ID: 8227744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of vocalic formant transitions and vowel quality on the English [s]-[ŝ] boundary.
    Whalen DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jan; 69(1):275-82. PubMed ID: 7217525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Duration of frication noise required for identification of English fricatives.
    Jongman A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1718-25. PubMed ID: 2708688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustically distinct and perceptually ambiguous: ʔayʔaǰuθəm (Salish) fricatives.
    Mellesmoen G; Babel M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Apr; 147(4):2959. PubMed ID: 32359305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of the English /s/-/integral of/ distinction relies on fricative noises and transitions, not on brief spectral slices.
    Whalen DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Oct; 90(4 Pt 1):1776-85. PubMed ID: 1960273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of actual and imputed talker gender on fricative perception, revisited (L).
    Munson B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2631-4. PubMed ID: 22087888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contributions of semantic and facial information to perception of nonsibilant fricatives.
    Jongman A; Wang Y; Kim BH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Dec; 46(6):1367-77. PubMed ID: 14700361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Formant transitions in fricative identification: the role of native fricative inventory.
    Wagner A; Ernestus M; Cutler A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2267-77. PubMed ID: 17069322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels spoken in sentence context.
    Strange W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 May; 85(5):2135-53. PubMed ID: 2732388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Labeling of /s/ and [see text] by listeners with normal and impaired hearing, revisited.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Jun; 46(3):636-48. PubMed ID: 14696991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acoustic characteristics of fricatives, amplitude of formants and clarity of speech produced without and with a medical mask.
    Nguyen DD; Chacon A; Payten C; Black R; Sheth M; McCabe P; Novakovic D; Madill C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2022 Mar; 57(2):366-380. PubMed ID: 35166414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cross-language similarities and differences in the uptake of place information.
    Wagner A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4256-67. PubMed ID: 23742376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception.
    Mann VA; Repp BH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Feb; 69(2):548-58. PubMed ID: 7462477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognition of vowels from information in fricatives: perceptual evidence of fricative-vowel coarticulation.
    Yeni-Komshian GH; Soli SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Oct; 70(4):966-75. PubMed ID: 7288043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing.
    Eisner F; McQueen JM
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Feb; 67(2):224-38. PubMed ID: 15971687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Flexible cue use in nonnative phonetic categorization.
    Broersma M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):712-5. PubMed ID: 18681562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Categorical dependence of vowel detection in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Eddins DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4539-46. PubMed ID: 18537402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.