69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24157542)
1. Efficacy of CytoLyt® hemolytic action on ThinPrep® LBC using cultured osteosarcoma cell line LM8.
Norimatsu Y; Ohsaki H; Masuno H; Kagawa A; Teramoto N; Kobayashi TK
Acta Cytol; 2014; 58(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 24157542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Romanowsky staining using liquid-based cytology: A pilot study using Cytolyt(®)/HESPANDER(®) processing solution for ThinPrep(®) preparations.
Kinoshita Y; Yuri T; Yoshizawa K; Takasu K; Emoto Y; Tsubura A; Shikata N
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Dec; 43(12):960-5. PubMed ID: 26390201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost efficiency analysis of modern cytocentrifugation methods versus liquid based (Cytyc Thinprep) processing of urinary samples.
Piaton E; Hutin K; Faÿnel J; Ranchin MC; Cottier M
J Clin Pathol; 2004 Nov; 57(11):1208-12. PubMed ID: 15509686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cytologic features of the endometrial adenocarcinoma: comparison of ThinPrep and BD SurePath preparations.
Norimatsu Y; Sakamoto S; Ohsaki H; Ozaki S; Yokoyama T; Shimizu K; Yanoh K; Akiyama M; Bamba M; Kobayashi TK
Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Aug; 41(8):673-81. PubMed ID: 23440947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Image analysis of peripheral compression artefacts of ThinPrep(®) liquid-based cytology preparations.
Choi J; Shim HS; Song JW; Chae SW; Lee YN; Kim JE; Kim SH
Cytopathology; 2013 Apr; 24(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 22612864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the diagnosis and grading of squamous intra-epithelial lesions, as some Bethesda system definitions require amendment.
Slater DN; Rice S; Stewart R; Melling SE; Hewer EM; Smith JH
Cytopathology; 2005 Aug; 16(4):168-78. PubMed ID: 16048503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterizing the Effect of Processing Technique and Solution Type on Cytomorphology Using Liquid-Based Cytology.
Ikeda K; Oboshi W; Hashimoto Y; Komene T; Yamaguchi Y; Sato S; Maruyama S; Furukawa N; Sakabe N; Nagata K
Acta Cytol; 2022; 66(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 34644702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of ThinPrep and SurePath liquid-based cytology and subsequent human papillomavirus DNA testing in China.
Zhao FH; Hu SY; Bian JJ; Liu B; Peck RB; Bao YP; Pan QJ; Frappart L; Sellors J; Qiao YL
Cancer Cytopathol; 2011 Dec; 119(6):387-94. PubMed ID: 21774094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preparation of DNA from cytological material: effects of fixation, staining, and mounting medium on DNA yield and quality.
Dejmek A; Zendehrokh N; Tomaszewska M; Edsjö A
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Jul; 121(7):344-53. PubMed ID: 23408720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EGFR mutations detection on liquid-based cytology: is microscopy still necessary?
Malapelle U; de Rosa N; Bellevicine C; Rocco D; Vitiello F; Piantedosi FV; Illiano A; Nappi O; Troncone G
J Clin Pathol; 2012 Jun; 65(6):561-4. PubMed ID: 22466414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel solution configuration on liquid-based endometrial cytology.
Lv S; Wang R; Wang Q; Han L; Tuo X; Hou H; Liu Y; Shi Z; Wang Q; Li Y; Sun C; Xue X; Li Q
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0190851. PubMed ID: 29401497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of liquid-based cytology fixing solution on immunocytochemistry: Efficacy of antigen retrieval in cytologic specimens.
Sakabe N; Maruyama S; Ito C; Shimoyama Y; Sudo K; Sato S; Ikeda K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2023 Sep; 51(9):546-553. PubMed ID: 37329327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accurate assessment of cell density in low cellular liquid-based cervical cytology.
Siebers AG; van der Laak JA; Huberts-Manders R; Vedder JE; Bulten J
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 22708685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ThinPrep and cytospin preparations in the evaluation of exfoliative cytology specimens.
Elsheikh TM; Kirkpatrick JL; Wu HH
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 108(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 16550571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
Sigurdsson K
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Liquid-based preparations versus conventional cytology: specimen adequacy and diagnostic agreement in oral lesions.
Hayama FH; Motta AC; Silva Ade P; Migliari DA
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2005; 10(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 15735543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stability of DNA, RNA, cytomorphology, and immunoantigenicity in Residual ThinPrep Specimens.
Kim Y; Choi KR; Chae MJ; Shin BK; Kim HK; Kim A; Kim BH
APMIS; 2013 Nov; 121(11):1064-72. PubMed ID: 23566220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Production of calves by transfer of nuclei from cultured somatic cells obtained from Japanese black bulls.
Shiga K; Fujita T; Hirose K; Sasae Y; Nagai T
Theriogenology; 1999 Aug; 52(3):527-35. PubMed ID: 10734386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. KGF increases SP-A and SP-D mRNA levels and secretion in cultured rat alveolar type II cells.
Xu X; McCormick-Shannon K; Voelker DR; Mason RJ
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol; 1998 Feb; 18(2):168-78. PubMed ID: 9476903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Small cell carcinoma of the cervix in liquid-based Pap test: utilization of split-sample immunocytochemical and molecular analysis.
Giorgadze T; Kanhere R; Pang C; Ganote C; Miller LE; Tabaczka P; Brown E; Husain M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Mar; 40(3):214-9. PubMed ID: 20891001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
