203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24157896)
41. Fractal dimension in aspiration cytology smears of breast and cervical lesions.
Ohri S; Dey P; Nijhawan R
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2004 Apr; 26(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 15131899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Development, Application and Utility of a Machine Learning Approach for Melanoma and Non-Melanoma Lesion Classification Using Counting Box Fractal Dimension.
Romero-Morelos P; Herrera-López E; González-Yebra B
Diagnostics (Basel); 2024 May; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 38893659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Core-periphery disparity in fractal behavior of complex networks.
Moon JY; Lee D; Koolen JH; Kim S
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Sep; 84(3 Pt 2):037103. PubMed ID: 22060535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Modified Richardson's method versus the box-counting method in neuroscience.
Zaletel I; Ristanović D; Stefanović BD; Puškaš N
J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Mar; 242():93-6. PubMed ID: 25601478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Spectral dimensions of hierarchical scale-free networks with weighted shortcuts.
Hwang S; Yun CK; Lee DS; Kahng B; Kim D
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2010 Nov; 82(5 Pt 2):056110. PubMed ID: 21230548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Research on a Fractal Dimension Calculation Method for a Nano-Polymer Microspheres Dispersed System.
Zhao W; Yan J; Hou G; Diwu P; Liu T; Hou J; Li R
Front Chem; 2021; 9():732797. PubMed ID: 34616712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Scaling of average receiving time on weighted polymer networks with some topological properties.
Ye D; Liu S; Li J; Zhang F; Han C; Chen W; Zhang Y
Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):2128. PubMed ID: 28522831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Discrimination of MR images of breast masses with fractal-interpolation function models.
Penn AI; Bolinger L; Schnall MD; Loew MH
Acad Radiol; 1999 Mar; 6(3):156-63. PubMed ID: 10898034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Correlation of Fractal Dimension Values with Implant Insertion Torque and Resonance Frequency Values at Implant Recipient Sites.
Suer BT; Yaman Z; Buyuksarac B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 26478979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Community detection in directed weighted networks using Voronoi partitioning.
Molnár B; Márton IB; Horvát S; Ercsey-Ravasz M
Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8124. PubMed ID: 38582947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The influence of edge detection algorithms on the estimation of the fractal dimension of binary digital images.
Ahammer H; DeVaney TT
Chaos; 2004 Mar; 14(1):183-8. PubMed ID: 15003059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Box dimension of the border of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Sajid M; Husain A; Reddy J; Alresheedi MT; Al Yahya SA; Al-Rajy A
Heliyon; 2023 Apr; 9(4):e14846. PubMed ID: 37025773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Scaling theory of fractal complex networks.
Fronczak A; Fronczak P; Samsel MJ; Makulski K; Łepek M; Mrowinski MJ
Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):9079. PubMed ID: 38643243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Skeleton and fractal scaling in complex networks.
Goh KI; Salvi G; Kahng B; Kim D
Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Jan; 96(1):018701. PubMed ID: 16486532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Correlated rigidity percolation in fractal lattices.
Machlus S; Zhang S; Mao X
Phys Rev E; 2021 Jan; 103(1-1):012104. PubMed ID: 33601532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Higuchi dimension of digital images.
Ahammer H
PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e24796. PubMed ID: 21931854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Non-homogeneous fractal hierarchical weighted networks.
Dong Y; Dai M; Ye D
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0121946. PubMed ID: 25849619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Properties of the Vascular Networks in Malignant Tumors.
Chimal-Eguía JC; Castillo-Montiel E; Paez-Hernández RT
Entropy (Basel); 2020 Jan; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 33285941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Transitive closure and metric inequality of weighted graphs: detecting protein interaction modules using cliques.
Ding C; He X; Xiong H; Peng H; Holbrook SR
Int J Data Min Bioinform; 2006; 1(2):162-77. PubMed ID: 18399069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Fractal-feature distance as a substitute for observer performance index in contrast-detail examination.
Imai K; Ikeda M; Enchi Y; Niimi T
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):541-5. PubMed ID: 17689214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
