These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24159560)
21. Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS. Neuling T; Wagner S; Wolters CH; Zaehle T; Herrmann CS Front Psychiatry; 2012; 3():83. PubMed ID: 23015792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Food craving, food choice and consumption: The role of impulsivity and sham-controlled tDCS stimulation of the right dlPFC. Georgii C; Goldhofer P; Meule A; Richard A; Blechert J Physiol Behav; 2017 Aug; 177():20-26. PubMed ID: 28396289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Safety parameter considerations of anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in rats. Jackson MP; Truong D; Brownlow ML; Wagner JA; McKinley RA; Bikson M; Jankord R Brain Behav Immun; 2017 Aug; 64():152-161. PubMed ID: 28427911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. High-resolution head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: A labeling analysis. Thomas C; Huang Y; Faria PC; Datta A Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():6442-6445. PubMed ID: 31947317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes. Esmaeilpour Z; Marangolo P; Hampstead BM; Bestmann S; Galletta E; Knotkova H; Bikson M Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(2):310-321. PubMed ID: 29258808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is transcranial direct current stimulation an effective modality in reducing food craving? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mostafavi SA; Khaleghi A; Mohammadi MR; Akhondzadeh S Nutr Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 23(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 29734883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Translating tDCS into the field of obesity: mechanism-driven approaches. Alonso-Alonso M Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():512. PubMed ID: 23986687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: a basis for high-definition tDCS. Edwards D; Cortes M; Datta A; Minhas P; Wassermann EM; Bikson M Neuroimage; 2013 Jul; 74():266-75. PubMed ID: 23370061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of gender-related differences in transcranial direct current stimulation: A Computational Study Thomas C; Ghodratitoostani I; Delbem ACB; Ali A; Datta A Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():5196-5199. PubMed ID: 31947029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Enhancing vigilance in operators with prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Nelson JT; McKinley RA; Golob EJ; Warm JS; Parasuraman R Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 85 Pt 3():909-17. PubMed ID: 23235272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Inconsistent outcomes of transcranial direct current stimulation may originate from anatomical differences among individuals: electric field simulation using individual MRI data. Kim JH; Kim DW; Chang WH; Kim YH; Kim K; Im CH Neurosci Lett; 2014 Apr; 564():6-10. PubMed ID: 24508704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Modulation of cortical responses by transcranial direct current stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A resting-state EEG and TMS-EEG study. Gordon PC; Zrenner C; Desideri D; Belardinelli P; Zrenner B; Brunoni AR; Ziemann U Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(5):1024-1032. PubMed ID: 29921529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A modeling study. Csifcsák G; Boayue NM; Puonti O; Thielscher A; Mittner M J Affect Disord; 2018 Jul; 234():164-173. PubMed ID: 29529550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Stimulation Effect of Inter-subject Variability in tDCS-Multi-scale Modeling Study. Im C; Seo H; Jun SC Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():3092-3095. PubMed ID: 30441048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in ADHD: A Systematic Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Protocol-induced Electrical Field Modeling Results. Salehinejad MA; Nejati V; Mosayebi-Samani M; Mohammadi A; Wischnewski M; Kuo MF; Avenanti A; Vicario CM; Nitsche MA Neurosci Bull; 2020 Oct; 36(10):1191-1212. PubMed ID: 32418073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Transcranial direct current stimulation in pediatric brain: a computational modeling study. Minhas P; Bikson M; Woods AJ; Rosen AR; Kessler SK Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():859-62. PubMed ID: 23366028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Towards precise brain stimulation: Is electric field simulation related to neuromodulation? Antonenko D; Thielscher A; Saturnino GB; Aydin S; Ittermann B; Grittner U; Flöel A Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(5):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 30930209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of electric field modeling pipelines for transcranial direct current stimulation. Bhalerao GV; Sreeraj VS; Bose A; Narayanaswamy JC; Venkatasubramanian G Neurophysiol Clin; 2021 Aug; 51(4):303-318. PubMed ID: 34023189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of posture on electric fields of non-invasive brain stimulation. Mikkonen M; Laakso I Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(6):065019. PubMed ID: 30708366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Electric field and current density distribution in an anatomical head model during transcranial direct current stimulation for tinnitus treatment. Parazzini M; Fiocchi S; Ravazzani P Bioelectromagnetics; 2012 Sep; 33(6):476-87. PubMed ID: 22298345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]