BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24160747)

  • 1. Comparative effectiveness and acceptability of home-based and clinic-based sampling methods for sexually transmissible infections screening in females aged 14-50 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Odesanmi TY; Wasti SP; Odesanmi OS; Adegbola O; Oguntuase OO; Mahmood S
    Sex Health; 2013 Dec; 10(6):559-69. PubMed ID: 24160747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Home-based self-sampling and self-testing for sexually transmitted infections: acceptable and feasible alternatives to provider-based screening in low-income women in São Paulo, Brazil.
    Lippman SA; Jones HE; Luppi CG; Pinho AA; Veras MA; van de Wijgert JH
    Sex Transm Dis; 2007 Jul; 34(7):421-8. PubMed ID: 17091118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acceptability and feasibility of self-sampling for the screening of sexually transmitted infections in cabana privacy shelters.
    Pittman E; Purcell H; Dize L; Gaydos C; Patterson-Rose S; Biro F; Owens D; Widdice LE
    Int J STD AIDS; 2018 Apr; 29(5):461-465. PubMed ID: 28959922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Home-based versus clinic-based self-sampling and testing for sexually transmitted infections in Gugulethu, South Africa: randomised controlled trial.
    Jones HE; Altini L; de Kock A; Young T; van de Wijgert JH
    Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Dec; 83(7):552-7. PubMed ID: 17901084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the 'Colli-Pee', a first-void urine collection device for self-sampling at home for the detection of sexually transmitted infections, versus a routine clinic-based urine collection in a one-to-one comparison study design: efficacy and acceptability among MSM in Belgium.
    De Baetselier I; Smet H; Abdellati S; De Deken B; Cuylaerts V; Reyniers T; Vuylsteke B; Crucitti T
    BMJ Open; 2019 Apr; 9(4):e028145. PubMed ID: 30948618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of a risk quiz to predict infection for sexually transmitted infections: a retrospective analysis of acceptability and positivity.
    Gaydos CA; Jett-Goheen M; Barnes M; Dize L; Barnes P; Hsieh YH
    Sex Transm Infect; 2016 Feb; 92(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 26285773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acceptability and feasibility of recruiting women to collect a self-administered vaginal swab at a pharmacy clinic for sexually transmissible infection screening.
    Gaydos CA; Barnes M; Holden J; Silver B; Smith R; Hardick J; Quinn TC
    Sex Health; 2020 Aug; 17(4):392-394. PubMed ID: 32829744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening for HIV, hepatitis B and syphilis on dried blood spots: A promising method to better reach hidden high-risk populations with self-collected sampling.
    van Loo IHM; Dukers-Muijrers NHTM; Heuts R; van der Sande MAB; Hoebe CJPA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186722. PubMed ID: 29053737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Home screening compared with clinic-based screening for sexually transmitted infections.
    Graseck AS; Secura GM; Allsworth JE; Madden T; Peipert JF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 115(4):745-752. PubMed ID: 20308834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chlamyweb Study II: a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of an online offer of home-based
    Kersaudy-Rahib D; Lydié N; Leroy C; March L; Bébéar C; Arwidson P; de Barbeyrac B
    Sex Transm Infect; 2017 May; 93(3):188-195. PubMed ID: 28377422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Home compared with clinic-based screening for sexually transmitted infections: a randomized controlled trial.
    Graseck AS; Secura GM; Allsworth JE; Madden T; Peipert JF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 116(6):1311-1318. PubMed ID: 21099596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Future chlamydia screening preferences of men attending a sexually transmissible infection clinic.
    Roth A; Van Der Pol B; Dodge B; Fortenberry JD; Zimet G
    Sex Health; 2011 Sep; 8(3):419-26. PubMed ID: 21851785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expanding sexually transmitted infection screening among women and men engaging in transactional sex: the feasibility of field-based self-collection.
    Roth AM; Rosenberger JG; Reece M; Van Der Pol B
    Int J STD AIDS; 2013 Apr; 24(4):323-8. PubMed ID: 23970665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acceptability of self-collecting oropharyngeal swabs for sexually transmissible infection testing among men and women.
    Dangerfield Ii DT; Farley JE; Holden J; Barnes M; Barnes P; Jett-Goheen M; Gaydos C
    Sex Health; 2019 Jun; 16(3):296-298. PubMed ID: 30898197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Home STI testing: the adolescent female's opinion.
    Tebb KP; Paukku MH; Pai-Dhungat MR; Gyamfi AA; Shafer MA
    J Adolesc Health; 2004 Dec; 35(6):462-7. PubMed ID: 15581525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-screening for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in the human immunodeficiency virus clinic--high yields and high acceptability.
    Soni S; White JA
    Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Dec; 38(12):1107-9. PubMed ID: 22082720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Community and clinic-based screening for curable sexually transmissible infections in a high prevalence setting in Australia: a retrospective longitudinal analysis of clinical service data from 2006 to 2009.
    Silver B; Kaldor JM; Rumbold A; Ward J; Smith K; Dyda A; Ryder N; Yip TW; Su JY; Guy RJ
    Sex Health; 2016 Apr; 13(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 26678863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The acceptability and cost of a home-based chlamydia retesting strategy: findings from the REACT randomised controlled trial.
    Smith KS; Kaldor JM; Hocking JS; Jamil MS; McNulty AM; Read P; Bradshaw CS; Chen MY; Fairley CK; Wand H; Worthington K; Blake S; Knight V; Rawlinson W; Saville M; Tabrizi SN; Garland SM; Donovan B; Guy R
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Jan; 16():83. PubMed ID: 26822715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Could home sexually transmitted infection specimen collection with e-prescription be a cost-effective strategy for clinical trials and clinical care?
    Blake DR; Spielberg F; Levy V; Lensing S; Wolff PA; Venkatasubramanian L; Acevedo N; Padian N; Chattopadhyay I; Gaydos CA
    Sex Transm Dis; 2015 Jan; 42(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 25504295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Young Low-Risk Heterosexual Clients Prefer a Chlamydia Home Collection Test to a Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinic Visit in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, A Cross-Sectional Study.
    van Rooijen MS; Koekenbier RH; Hendriks A; de Vries HJ; van Leeuwen P; van Veen MG
    Sex Transm Dis; 2016 Nov; 43(11):710-716. PubMed ID: 27893603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.