These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Effect of repair resin type and surface treatment on the repair strength of heat-polymerized denture base resin. Alkurt M; Yeşil Duymuş Z; Gundogdu M J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 24161257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An alternative method of fabricating a custom tray for direct implant impressions. Cura C; Isik FG; Dundar M Gen Dent; 2011; 59(1):e22-4. PubMed ID: 21613027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Water immersion procedure for making light-cured custom trays with wax spacers. Baker PS; Frazier KB J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Dec; 82(6):714-5. PubMed ID: 10588808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The corrected cast impression: an alternative technique. Walton JN Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):779-81. PubMed ID: 20830890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An alternative method for direct custom tray construction using a visible light-cured resin. Castellani D; Basile M J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Jul; 78(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 9237149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays. Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dimensional accuracy of pickup implant impression: an in vitro comparison of novel modular versus standard custom trays. Simeone P; Valentini PP; Pizzoferrato R; Scudieri F Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):538-46. PubMed ID: 21691600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exposure times for contemporary composites. Rueggeberg FA; Swift EJ J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Apr; 25(2):82-4. PubMed ID: 23617379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A strain gauge analysis of microstrain induced by various splinting methods and acrylic resin types for implant impressions. Cerqueira NM; Ozcan M; Gonçalves M; da Rocha DM; Vasconcellos DK; Bottino MA; Yener-Salihoğlu E Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):341-5. PubMed ID: 22442773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A dual impression technique for implant overdentures. Jannesar S; Siadat H; Alikhasi M J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):327-9. PubMed ID: 17451474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Light-polymerized materials for custom impression trays. Wirz J; Jaeger K; Schmidli F Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 2196894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cure times for contemporary composites. Rueggeberg FA J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Feb; 25(1):3. PubMed ID: 23374403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A technique for verifying implant analog positions in the definitive cast. Sadid-Zadeh R; O'Neal SJ; Liu PR; Aponte-Wesson R J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 23522369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts. Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of light-cured acrylic resin for custom trays by undergraduate dental students: a survey. Khan SB; Geerts GA SADJ; 2008 Mar; 63(2):086, 088-92. PubMed ID: 18561806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]