BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24161667)

  • 1. Integrating patient reported outcomes with clinical cancer registry data: a feasibility study of the electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes From Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) system.
    Ashley L; Jones H; Thomas J; Newsham A; Downing A; Morris E; Brown J; Velikova G; Forman D; Wright P
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Oct; 15(10):e230. PubMed ID: 24161667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Feasibility test of a UK-scalable electronic system for regular collection of patient-reported outcome measures and linkage with clinical cancer registry data: the electronic Patient-reported Outcomes from Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) system.
    Ashley L; Jones H; Forman D; Newsham A; Brown J; Downing A; Velikova G; Wright P
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2011 Oct; 11():66. PubMed ID: 22029686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrating cancer survivors' experiences into UK cancer registries: design and development of the ePOCS system (electronic Patient-reported Outcomes from Cancer Survivors).
    Ashley L; Jones H; Thomas J; Forman D; Newsham A; Morris E; Johnson O; Velikova G; Wright P
    Br J Cancer; 2011 Nov; 105 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S74-81. PubMed ID: 22048035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Feasibility of collecting patient-generated health data to enhance cancer registry surveillance.
    Mangold KN; Gallicchio L; Gaysynsky A; Kent EE; Constantine K; Hesse BW
    J Cancer Surviv; 2021 Oct; 15(5):785-791. PubMed ID: 33400151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using the Clinical Research Network for psychosocial cancer research: lessons learned from two observational studies.
    Wright P; Fenlon D; Jones H; Foster C; Ashley L; Seymour KC; Velikova G; Okamoto I; Brown J
    BMJ Support Palliat Care; 2014 Jun; 4(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 24644175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Complementing clinical cancer registry data with patient reported outcomes: A feasibility study on routine electronic patient-reported outcome assessment for the Austrian Myelome Registry.
    Sztankay M; Neppl L; Wintner LM; Loth FL; Willenbacher W; Weger R; Weyrer W; Steurer M; Rumpold G; Holzner B
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2019 Nov; 28(6):e13154. PubMed ID: 31465136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Collection of cancer Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) to link with primary and secondary electronic care records to understand and improve long term cancer outcomes: A protocol paper.
    Stamp E; Clarke G; Wright P; Velikova G; Crossfield SSR; Zucker K; McInerney C; Bojke C; Martin A; Baxter P; Woroncow B; Wilson D; Warrington L; Absolom K; Burke D; Stables GI; Mitra A; Hutson R; Glaser AW; Hall G
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0266804. PubMed ID: 35427401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cancer survivors not participating in observational patient-reported outcome studies have a lower survival compared to participants: the population-based PROFILES registry.
    de Rooij BH; Ezendam NPM; Mols F; Vissers PAJ; Thong MSY; Vlooswijk CCP; Oerlemans S; Husson O; Horevoorts NJE; van de Poll-Franse LV
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Dec; 27(12):3313-3324. PubMed ID: 30167937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Study protocol of an equivalence randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of three different approaches to collecting Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) data using the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry-Victoria (PCOR-VIC).
    Hoque DM; Sampurno F; Ruseckaite R; Lorgelly P; Evans SM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jan; 17(1):75. PubMed ID: 28114981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a hospital-based patient-reported outcome framework for lung cancer patients: a study protocol.
    Moloczij N; Gough K; Solomon B; Ball D; Mileshkin L; Duffy M; Krishnasamy M
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Jan; 16(1):10. PubMed ID: 29325571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. eHealth System for Collecting and Utilizing Patient Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care) Among Cancer Patients: Mixed Methods Approach to Evaluate Feasibility and Acceptability.
    Girgis A; Durcinoska I; Levesque JV; Gerges M; Sandell T; Arnold A; Delaney GP;
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Oct; 19(10):e330. PubMed ID: 28970188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient-reported outcomes in survivors of breast cancer one, three, and five years post-diagnosis: a cancer registry-based feasibility study.
    Skandarajah AR; Lisy K; Ward A; Bishop J; Lacey K; Mann B; Jefford M
    Qual Life Res; 2021 Feb; 30(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 32997334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving an electronic system for measuring PROs in routine oncology practice.
    Wu AW; White SM; Blackford AL; Wolff AC; Carducci MA; Herman JM; Snyder CF;
    J Cancer Surviv; 2016 Jun; 10(3):573-82. PubMed ID: 26644190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures in melanoma clinical quality registries: a systematic review.
    Blood Z; Tran A; Caleo L; Saw R; Dieng M; Shackleton M; Soyer HP; Arnold C; Mann GJ; Morton RL
    BMJ Open; 2021 Feb; 11(2):e040751. PubMed ID: 33574144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tailored Web-Based Information for Younger and Older Patients with Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial of a Preparatory Educational Intervention on Patient Outcomes.
    Nguyen MH; Smets EM; Bol N; Loos EF; van Laarhoven HW; Geijsen D; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Tytgat KM; van Weert JC
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Oct; 21(10):e14407. PubMed ID: 31573911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrated care pathways for cancer survivors - a role for patient-reported outcome measures and health informatics.
    Warrington L; Absolom K; Velikova G
    Acta Oncol; 2015 May; 54(5):600-8. PubMed ID: 25751758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The feasibility of web surveys for obtaining patient-reported outcomes from cancer survivors: a randomized experiment comparing survey modes and brochure enclosures.
    Millar MM; Elena JW; Gallicchio L; Edwards SL; Carter ME; Herget KA; Sweeney C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):208. PubMed ID: 31730474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The acceptance and applicability of a patient-reported experience measurement tool in oncological care: a descriptive feasibility study in northern Germany.
    Rudolph C; Petersen GS; Pritzkuleit R; Storm H; Katalinic A
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Nov; 19(1):786. PubMed ID: 31675968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia.
    Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cancer survivor perspectives on sharing patient-generated health data with central cancer registries.
    Smith TG; Dunn ME; Levin KY; Tsakraklides SP; Mitchell SA; van de Poll-Franse LV; Ward KC; Wiggins CL; Wu XC; Hurlbert M; Aaronson NK
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Nov; 28(11):2957-2967. PubMed ID: 31399859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.