These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24162938)

  • 21. How to conduct a high-quality original study on a diagnostic research topic.
    Yao X; Vella E
    Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 26(3):305-309. PubMed ID: 28807251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Verification problems in diagnostic accuracy studies: consequences and solutions.
    de Groot JA; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Rutjes AW; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Moons KG
    BMJ; 2011 Aug; 343():d4770. PubMed ID: 21810869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. STARD statement: still room for improvement in the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Bossuyt PM
    Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):713-4. PubMed ID: 18710968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. CLSI evaluation protocols.
    Tholen D
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 2006 Aug; 38(8):38, 40-1. PubMed ID: 16983875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [How to use the STARD statement and the QUADAS-2 tool?].
    Cohen J; Bossuyt P; Levy C; Chalumeau M; Martinot A; Launay E
    Arch Pediatr; 2015 May; 22(5 Suppl 1):190-1. PubMed ID: 26112586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Metrological traceability in clinical biochemistry.
    White GH
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2011 Sep; 48(Pt 5):393-409. PubMed ID: 21795407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evidence-based laboratory medicine: addressing bias, generalisability and applicability in studies on diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    McQueen M
    Clin Biochem; 2003 Feb; 36(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 12587604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. New methods in the assessment of diagnostic procedures.
    Kleijnen J
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(7):519-25. PubMed ID: 17137065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adjusting for differential-verification bias in diagnostic-accuracy studies: a Bayesian approach.
    de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG
    Epidemiology; 2011 Mar; 22(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21228702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The mission of StaR Child Health is to improve the quality of the design, conduct, and reporting of pediatric clinical research by promoting the use of modern research standards. Introduction.
    Wittmeier KD; Craig J; Klassen TP; Offringa M
    Pediatrics; 2012 Jun; 129 Suppl 3():S111. PubMed ID: 22661755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Discussions on the diagnostic criteria for neonatal pathologic jaundice].
    Wei KL; Wang YS
    Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Jan; 47(1):17. PubMed ID: 19573374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Better reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Pai M; Sharma S
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 23(4):210-3. PubMed ID: 16327114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Changes on definition and diagnostic criteria of the chronic fatigue syndrome].
    Qin Y; Pang FS; Cai BY
    Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2009 Oct; 29(10):946-8. PubMed ID: 20073230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles.
    ; Banoo S; Bell D; Bossuyt P; Herring A; Mabey D; Poole F; Smith PG; Sriram N; Wongsrichanalai C; Linke R; O'Brien R; Perkins M
    Nat Rev Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 6(11 Suppl):S16-26. PubMed ID: 22745954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sources of bias in diagnostic accuracy studies and the diagnostic process.
    Furukawa TA; Guyatt GH
    CMAJ; 2006 Feb; 174(4):481-2. PubMed ID: 16477059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pathology Reports: A Second Look.
    Novis DA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Apr; 140(4):300. PubMed ID: 27028388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Diagnostic Stewardship to Prevent Diagnostic Error.
    Morgan DJ; Malani PN; Diekema DJ
    JAMA; 2023 Apr; 329(15):1255-1256. PubMed ID: 36862424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sensitivity and specificity should be de-emphasized in diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Moons KG; Harrell FE
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):670-2. PubMed ID: 12809422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sample size for diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Salmi LR; Michel P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 57(8):869-70; author reply 871-2. PubMed ID: 15485744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2003 Jul; 40(Pt 4):357-63. PubMed ID: 12880535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.