251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24163154)
1. Exploring temporal dissipation of attention settings in auditory task switching.
Koch I; Lawo V
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 24163154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intentional attention switching in dichotic listening: exploring the efficiency of nonspatial and spatial selection.
Lawo V; Fels J; Oberem J; Koch I
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):2010-24. PubMed ID: 25248101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The persisting influence of unattended auditory information: Negative priming in intentional auditory attention switching.
Eben C; Koch I; Jolicoeur P; Nolden S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1835-1846. PubMed ID: 31898070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Switching in the cocktail party: exploring intentional control of auditory selective attention.
Koch I; Lawo V; Fels J; Vorländer M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1140-7. PubMed ID: 21553997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intentional preparation of auditory attention-switches: Explicit cueing and sequential switch-predictability.
Seibold JC; Nolden S; Oberem J; Fels J; Koch I
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jun; 71(6):1382-1395. PubMed ID: 28631530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dissociable effects of auditory attention switching and stimulus-response compatibility.
Lawo V; Koch I
Psychol Res; 2014; 78(3):379-86. PubMed ID: 24526242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Examining age-related differences in auditory attention control using a task-switching procedure.
Lawo V; Koch I
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2014 Mar; 69(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 23197343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory attention switching and judgment switching: Exploring multicomponent task representations.
Seibold JC; Nolden S; Oberem J; Fels J; Koch I
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1823-1832. PubMed ID: 29959662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of crossmodal competition and dimensional overlap in crossmodal attention switching.
Kreutzfeldt M; Stephan DN; Sturm W; Willmes K; Koch I
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():67-76. PubMed ID: 25577489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The flip side of the auditory spatial selection benefit: larger attentional mixing costs for target selection by ear than by gender in auditory task switching.
Koch I; Lawo V
Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 25384645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition.
Koch I; Frings C; Schuch S
Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):570-579. PubMed ID: 28286905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptual and conceptual priming of cue encoding in task switching.
Schneider DW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1112-26. PubMed ID: 26766605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intentional switching in auditory selective attention: Exploring age-related effects in a spatial setup requiring speech perception.
Oberem J; Koch I; Fels J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():36-43. PubMed ID: 28456098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching.
Kandalowski SRM; Seibold JC; Schuch S; Koch I
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1632-1643. PubMed ID: 31820281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temporal distinctiveness and repetition benefits in task switching: disentangling stimulus-related and response-related contributions.
Horoufchin H; Philipp AM; Koch I
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):434-46. PubMed ID: 20680886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cognitive control in the cocktail party: Preparing selective attention to dichotically presented voices supports distractor suppression.
Nolden S; Ibrahim CN; Koch I
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Apr; 81(3):727-737. PubMed ID: 30569433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The dissipating task-repetition benefit in cued task switching: task-set decay or temporal distinctiveness?
Horoufchin H; Philipp AM; Koch I
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):455-72. PubMed ID: 20853997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Components of task switching: a closer look at task switching and cue switching.
Schmitz F; Voss A
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():184-96. PubMed ID: 25004102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
