These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24163333)

  • 1. Hierarchical encoding makes individuals in a group seem more attractive.
    Walker D; Vul E
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):230-5. PubMed ID: 24163333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ensemble statistics shape face adaptation and the cheerleader effect.
    Ying H; Burns E; Lin X; Xu H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Mar; 148(3):421-436. PubMed ID: 30802125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Limited evidence of hierarchical encoding in the cheerleader effect.
    Carragher DJ; Thomas NA; Gwinn OS; Nicholls MER
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):9329. PubMed ID: 31249339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ensemble perception of facial attractiveness.
    Luo AX; Zhou G
    J Vis; 2018 Aug; 18(8):7. PubMed ID: 30105386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Friend effects framework: Contrastive and hierarchical processing in cheerleader effects.
    Burns EJ; Yang W; Ying H
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104715. PubMed ID: 33823426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of averageness on children's judgments of facial attractiveness.
    Vingilis-Jaremko L; Maurer D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Aug; 115(4):624-39. PubMed ID: 23708730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: attractive faces are not always average.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Unger L; Little AC; Feinberg DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1420-30. PubMed ID: 18085954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facial attractiveness biases the perception of eye contact.
    Kloth N; Altmann CS; Schweinberger SR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):1906-18. PubMed ID: 21756185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Eiselt ML; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Jan; 69(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 18213458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex, beauty and the orbitofrontal cortex.
    Ishai A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Feb; 63(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 16759727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visuospatial asymmetries do not modulate the cheerleader effect.
    Carragher DJ; Lawrence BJ; Thomas NA; Nicholls MER
    Sci Rep; 2018 Feb; 8(1):2548. PubMed ID: 29416057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The two sides of beauty: laterality and the duality of facial attractiveness.
    Franklin RG; Adams RB
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Mar; 72(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 19914760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The "cheerleader effect" in facial and bodily attractiveness: A result of memory bias and not perceptual encoding.
    Hsieh JY; Gwinn OS; Brooks KR; Stephen ID; Carragher DJ; Nicholls ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 May; 74(5):972-980. PubMed ID: 33174508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Change in Evaluation Mode Can Cause a Cheerleader Effect.
    Messner C; Carnelli M; Höhener PS
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():607448. PubMed ID: 33981266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attractiveness, distinctiveness, and recognition of faces: attractive faces can be typical or distinctive but are not better recognized.
    Wickham LH; Morris PE
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(3):455-68. PubMed ID: 14503395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attention Alters Perceived Attractiveness.
    Störmer VS; Alvarez GA
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Apr; 27(4):563-71. PubMed ID: 26966228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Something to smile about: the interrelationship between attractiveness and emotional expression.
    Golle J; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(2):298-310. PubMed ID: 23875865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Positive sequential dependency for face attractiveness perception.
    Van der Burg E; Rhodes G; Alais D
    J Vis; 2019 Oct; 19(12):6. PubMed ID: 31621804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceived relative attractiveness of facial profiles with varying degrees of skeletal anomalies.
    Hönn M; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2005 May; 66(3):187-96. PubMed ID: 15959632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The face, beauty, and symmetry: perceiving asymmetry in beautiful faces.
    Zaidel DW; Cohen JA
    Int J Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 115(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 16040358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.