These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24164643)

  • 1. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy demonstrates less morbidity than open radical prostatectomy: an analysis of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database with a focus on surgical trainee involvement.
    Caras RJ; Lustik MB; Kern SQ; Sterbis JR; McMann LP
    J Endourol; 2014 Mar; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 24164643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of outcomes after minimally invasive versus open partial nephrectomy with respect to trainee involvement utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Kern SQ; Lustik MB; McMann LP; Thibault GP; Sterbis JR
    J Endourol; 2014 Jan; 28(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 24007345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patterns-of-care and health economic analysis of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Australian public health system.
    Basto M; Sathianathen N; Te Marvelde L; Ryan S; Goad J; Lawrentschuk N; Costello AJ; Moon DA; Heriot AG; Butler J; Murphy DG
    BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):930-9. PubMed ID: 26350758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted vs open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: a Cochrane systematic review.
    Ilic D; Evans SM; Allan CA; Jung JH; Murphy D; Frydenberg M
    BJU Int; 2018 Jun; 121(6):845-853. PubMed ID: 29063728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Acute and Chronic Surgical Complications Following Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Traditional Open Radical Prostatectomy Among Men in Taiwan.
    Wu SY; Chang CL; Chen CI; Huang CC
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2120156. PubMed ID: 34432012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: comparative analysis of operative and pathologic outcomes for three techniques with a single surgeon's experience.
    Akand M; Celik O; Avci E; Duman I; Erdogru T
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2015 Feb; 19(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 25753865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.
    Trinh QD; Sammon J; Sun M; Ravi P; Ghani KR; Bianchi M; Jeong W; Shariat SF; Hansen J; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Rogers CG; Peabody JO; Montorsi F; Menon M; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):679-85. PubMed ID: 22206800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trainee-associated outcomes in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: propensity score analysis accounting for operative time, procedure complexity and patient comorbidity.
    Kasten KR; Celio AC; Trakimas L; Manwaring ML; Spaniolas K
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):702-711. PubMed ID: 28726138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy.
    Tewari A; Sooriakumaran P; Bloch DA; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Hebert AE; Wiklund P
    Eur Urol; 2012 Jul; 62(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 22405509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contemporary practice and technique-related outcomes for radical prostatectomy in the UK: a report of national outcomes.
    Laird A; Fowler S; Good DW; Stewart GD; Srinivasan V; Cahill D; Brewster SF; McNeill SA;
    BJU Int; 2015 May; 115(5):753-63. PubMed ID: 25046349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a French center experience].
    Verdier E; Doré B; Fromont G; Pirès C; Lecoq B; Dezael JC; Irani J
    Prog Urol; 2014 Mar; 24(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 24560206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic compared with open prostatectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.
    Liu JJ; Maxwell BG; Panousis P; Chung BI
    Urology; 2013 Sep; 82(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 23876584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of outcomes after TURP versus photoselective vaporization of the prostate with respect to trainee involvement utilizing ACS NSQIP.
    Olcese SP; Derosa R; Kern SQ; Lustik MB; Sterbis JR; McMann LP
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2014 Sep; 17(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 24732080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the learning curve of experienced laparoscopic surgeons in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Stolzenburg JU; Qazi HA; Holze S; Mende M; Nicolaus M; Franz T; Ho Thi P; Dietel A; Liatsikos E; Do M
    J Endourol; 2013 Jan; 27(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 22834963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perioperative outcomes of open radical prostatectomy versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in Asian men: comparison of two initial series by the same surgeon.
    Leewansangtong S; Wiangsakunna W; Taweemankongsap T
    Int Braz J Urol; 2009; 35(2):151-6; discussion 156-7. PubMed ID: 19409118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contemporary laparoscopic and open radical retropubic prostatectomy: pathologic outcomes and Kattan postoperative nomograms are equivalent.
    Park S; Jaffer O; Lotan Y; Saboorian H; Roehrborn CG; Cadeddu JA
    Urology; 2007 Jan; 69(1):118-22. PubMed ID: 17270631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is age an independent risk factor for medical complications following minimally invasive radical prostatectomy? An evaluation of contemporary American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement (ACS-NSQIP) data.
    Dagrosa LM; Ingimarsson JP; Gorlov IP; Higgins JH; Hyams ES
    J Robot Surg; 2016 Dec; 10(4):343-346. PubMed ID: 27263110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utilization and timing of blood transfusions following open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Korets R; Weinberg AC; Alberts BD; Woldu SL; Mann MJ; Badani KK
    J Endourol; 2014 Dec; 28(12):1418-23. PubMed ID: 25333318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy: Comparison between surgical time, complications and length of hospital stay.
    Martínez-Holguín E; Herranz-Amo F; Hernández-Cavieres J; Lledó-García E; Subirá-Ríos D; Renedo-Villar T; Hernández-Fernández C
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2020; 44(1):41-48. PubMed ID: 31806247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison between open and laparoscopic approach in radical prostatectomy].
    Raventós Busquets CX; Gómez Lanza E; Cecchini Rosell L; Trilla Herrera E; Orsola los de Santos A; Planas Morin J; De Torre Ramírez I; Morote Robles J
    Actas Urol Esp; 2007 Feb; 31(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 17645093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.