These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24165162)

  • 1. Personalized estimates of radiation dose from dedicated breast CT in a diagnostic population and comparison with diagnostic mammography.
    Vedantham S; Shi L; Karellas A; O'Connell AM; Conover DL
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 58(22):7921-36. PubMed ID: 24165162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population.
    Vedantham S; Shi L; Karellas A; O'Connell AM
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7317-28. PubMed ID: 23231281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry.
    Sechopoulos I; Bliznakova K; Qin X; Fei B; Feng SS
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5050-9. PubMed ID: 22894430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mean glandular dose in digital mamography in women with breast implants.
    Couto LS; Freitas-Junior R; Correa RS; Peixoto JE; Almeida CD; Rodrigues DCN; Glassman LM; Soares LR
    J Radiol Prot; 2019 Apr; 39(2):498-510. PubMed ID: 30812019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.
    Sechopoulos I; Feng SS; D'Orsi CJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4110-20. PubMed ID: 20879571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation dose estimates based on Monte Carlo simulation for spiral breast computed tomography imaging in a large cohort of patients.
    Shim S; Kolditz D; Steiding C; Ruth V; Hoetker AM; Unkelbach J; Boss A
    Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2417-2428. PubMed ID: 36622370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and dedicated breast CT.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Di Lillo F; Tucciariello RM; Bliznakova K; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2018 Nov; 55():142-148. PubMed ID: 30314732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A study of mean glandular dose during diagnostic mammography in Malaysia and some of the factors affecting it.
    Jamal N; Ng KH; McLean D
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 76(904):238-45. PubMed ID: 12711643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered.
    Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6337-48. PubMed ID: 26520725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality.
    O'Connell A; Conover DL; Zhang Y; Seifert P; Logan-Young W; Lin CF; Sahler L; Ning R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):496-509. PubMed ID: 20651210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation dose affected by mammographic composition and breast size: first application of a radiation dose management system for full-field digital mammography in Korean women.
    Baek JE; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Lee HS
    World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Feb; 15(1):38. PubMed ID: 28153022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT.
    Boone JM; Kwan AL; Seibert JA; Shah N; Lindfors KK; Nelson TR
    Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3767-76. PubMed ID: 16475776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT: Data acquisition strategies based on projection angle-dependent normalized glandular dose coefficients.
    Tseng HW; Karellas A; Vedantham S
    Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1406-1417. PubMed ID: 36427332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Updated breast CT dose coefficients (DgN
    Hernandez AM; Becker AE; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1455-1466. PubMed ID: 30661250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation dosimetry of a clinical prototype dedicated cone-beam breast CT system with offset detector.
    Tseng HW; Karellas A; Vedantham S
    Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1079-1088. PubMed ID: 33501686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating energy deposition in glandular tissues for mammography using multiscale Monte Carlo simulations.
    Oliver PAK; Thomson RM
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 30657190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparisons of glandular breast dose between digital mammography, tomosynthesis and breast CT based on anthropomorphic patient-derived breast phantoms.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2022 May; 97():50-58. PubMed ID: 35395535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Establishment of regional diagnostic reference levels for digital mammography in Western Province of Sri Lanka.
    Niroshani HS; Jeyasugiththan J; Senanayake G; Negishi T
    J Radiol Prot; 2021 Feb; 41(1):. PubMed ID: 33271512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation.
    Boone JM; Nelson TR; Lindfors KK; Seibert JA
    Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):657-67. PubMed ID: 11719660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microcalcification detectability using a bench-top prototype photon-counting breast CT based on a Si strip detector.
    Cho HM; Ding H; Barber WC; Iwanczyk JS; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4401-10. PubMed ID: 26133636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.