These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Evaluating sterile human acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study. Venturi ML; Mesbahi AN; Boehmler JH; Marrogi AJ Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Jan; 131(1):9e-18e. PubMed ID: 22990174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction. Karp NS; Salibian AA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 33620924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Preliminary Results Supporting the Bacterial Hypothesis in Red Breast Syndrome following Postmastectomy Acellular Dermal Matrix- and Implant-Based Reconstructions. Danino MA; El Khatib AM; Doucet O; Dao L; Efanov JI; Bou-Merhi JS; Iliescu-Nelea M Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Dec; 144(6):988e-992e. PubMed ID: 31764635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Explantation in Tissue Expander and Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix: How to Avoid Early Reconstructive Failures. Cohen LE; Bogue JT; Jin J; Disa JJ Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Apr; 147(4):579e-586e. PubMed ID: 33710042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The BREASTrial Stage III: Acellular Dermal Matrix Breast Reconstruction Outcomes from 3 Months to 2 Years Postoperatively. Mendenhall SD; Moss WD; Graham EM; Carter G; Agarwal JP Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Jan; 151(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 36194057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Moffitt Cancer Center Experience of Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: Does Acellular Dermal Matrix Increase Return to the Operating Room? Weinstein B; Kumar A; Smith P; Dayicioglu D Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Jun; 80(6S Suppl 6):S377-S380. PubMed ID: 29369110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Does acellular dermal matrix really improve aesthetic outcome in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction? Ibrahim AM; Koolen PG; Ganor O; Markarian MK; Tobias AM; Lee BT; Lin SJ; Mureau MA Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Jun; 39(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 25894022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity. Sbitany H; Serletti JM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Dec; 128(6):1162-1169. PubMed ID: 22094735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. One-stage immediate breast reconstruction with implants: a new option for immediate reconstruction. Cassileth L; Kohanzadeh S; Amersi F Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 69(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 21734545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A Matched-Pair Analysis of Prepectoral with Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Postoperative Complication Rate? Momeni A; Remington AC; Wan DC; Nguyen D; Gurtner GC Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Oct; 144(4):801-807. PubMed ID: 31568276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Outcomes of Acellular Dermal Matrix for Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction with Radiotherapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Craig ES; Clemens MW; Koshy JC; Wren J; Hong Z; Butler CE; Garvey PB; Selber JC; Kronowitz SJ Aesthet Surg J; 2019 Feb; 39(3):279-288. PubMed ID: 29800083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: Evaluation of complications and safety. Kalstrup J; Balslev Willert C; Brinch-Møller Weitemeyer M; Hougaard Chakera A; Hölmich LR Breast; 2021 Dec; 60():192-198. PubMed ID: 34688959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Evaluation of the Safety of a GalaFLEX-AlloDerm Construct in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction. Sigalove S; O'Rorke E; Maxwell GP; Gabriel A Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Oct; 150():75S-81S. PubMed ID: 35943912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evolution of the Surgical Technique for "Breast in a Day" Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Transitioning from Dual-Plane to Prepectoral Implant Placement. Antony AK; Poirier J; Madrigrano A; Kopkash KA; Robinson EC Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Jun; 143(6):1547-1556. PubMed ID: 31136464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The breast reconstruction evaluation of acellular dermal matrix as a sling trial (BREASTrial): design and methods of a prospective randomized trial. Agarwal JP; Mendenhall SD; Anderson LA; Ying J; Boucher KM; Liu T; Neumayer LA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jan; 135(1):20e-28e. PubMed ID: 25539330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review. Faulkner HR; Shikowitz-Behr L; McLeod M; Wright E; Hulsen J; Austen WG Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Dec; 146(6):731e-736e. PubMed ID: 33234950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparison study of two types of expander-based breast reconstruction: acellular dermal matrix-assisted versus total submuscular placement. Hanna KR; DeGeorge BR; Mericli AF; Lin KY; Drake DB Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jan; 70(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 21862915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. An algorithmic approach for selective acellular dermal matrix use in immediate two-stage breast reconstruction: indications and outcomes. Jordan SW; Khavanin N; Fine NA; Kim JYS Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Aug; 134(2):178-188. PubMed ID: 25068318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]