173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24165623)
1. Comparing five alternative methods of breast reconstruction surgery: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Grover R; Padula WV; Van Vliet M; Ridgway EB
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Nov; 132(5):709e-723e. PubMed ID: 24165623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Breast Reconstruction Options in the Setting of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy Using the BREAST-Q.
Razdan SN; Cordeiro PG; Albornoz CR; Ro T; Cohen WA; Mehrara BJ; McCarthy CM; Disa JJ; Pusic AL; Matros E
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):510e-517e. PubMed ID: 26910695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of acellular dermal matrix to autologous dermal flaps in single-stage, implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Krishnan NM; Chatterjee A; Van Vliet MM; Powell SG; Rosen JM; Nigriny JF
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 May; 131(5):953-961. PubMed ID: 23629077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients.
Levine SM; Patel N; Disa JJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 22964681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Autologous options for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparison of outcomes based on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Gart MS; Smetona JT; Hanwright PJ; Fine NA; Bethke KP; Khan SA; Wang E; Kim JY
J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Feb; 216(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 23211118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of implants versus autologous perforator flaps using the BREAST-Q.
Matros E; Albornoz CR; Razdan SN; Mehrara BJ; Macadam SA; Ro T; McCarthy CM; Disa JJ; Cordeiro PG; Pusic AL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Apr; 135(4):937-946. PubMed ID: 25517411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flap Failure and Wound Complications in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A National Perspective.
Massenburg BB; Sanati-Mehrizy P; Ingargiola MJ; Rosa JH; Taub PJ
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 39(6):902-9. PubMed ID: 26487657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications.
Spear SL; Onyewu C
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Mar; 105(3):930-42. PubMed ID: 10724252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast Reconstruction and Radiation Therapy.
Yun JH; Diaz R; Orman AG
Cancer Control; 2018; 25(1):1073274818795489. PubMed ID: 30132338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can the cost affect the choice of various methods of postmastectomy breast reconstruction?
Franchelli S; Leone MS; Berrino P; Passarelli B; Cicchetti S; Perniciaro G; Delfino E; Santi P
Tumori; 1998; 84(3):383-6. PubMed ID: 9678622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 2-Year Complication Rates Among Common Techniques for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.
Bennett KG; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Pusic AL; Wilkins EG
JAMA Surg; 2018 Oct; 153(10):901-908. PubMed ID: 29926077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing value in breast reconstruction: A systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies.
Sheckter CC; Matros E; Momeni A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Mar; 71(3):353-365. PubMed ID: 29196176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Various methods of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: an economic comparison.
Elkowitz A; Colen S; Slavin S; Seibert J; Weinstein M; Shaw W
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1993 Jul; 92(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 8516410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous tissue reconstruction after whole-breast irradiation.
Disa JJ; Cordeiro PG; Heerdt AH; Petrek JA; Borgen PJ; Hidalgo DA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Jan; 111(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 12496572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of free autologous breast reconstruction with and without the use of laser-assisted indocyanine green angiography: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Chatterjee A; Krishnan NM; Van Vliet MM; Powell SG; Rosen JM; Ridgway EB
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 May; 131(5):693e-701e. PubMed ID: 23629108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of 18-month outcomes and costs of breast reconstruction flap procedures.
Israeli R; Funk S; Reaven NL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Mar; 133(3):471-479. PubMed ID: 24572840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-utility analysis of four common surgical treatment pathways for breast cancer.
Kouwenberg CAE; Mureau MAM; Kranenburg LW; Rakhorst H; de Leeuw D; Klem TMAL; Koppert LB; Ramos IC; Busschbach JJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jun; 47(6):1299-1308. PubMed ID: 33349523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maximizing the Volume of Latissimus Dorsi Flap in Autologous Breast Reconstruction with Simultaneous Multisite Fat Grafting.
Zhu L; Mohan AT; Vijayasekaran A; Hou C; Sur YJ; Morsy M; Saint-Cyr M
Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Feb; 36(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 26546990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The cost as an additional variable in the choice among different techniques of postmastectomy breast reconstruction].
Passarelli B; Ferrari C; Leone MS; Franchelli S; Michelini F; Delfino E; Santi PL
Minerva Chir; 1998 Mar; 53(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 9617118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing the cost of delayed and immediate autologous breast reconstruction in Belgium.
Neyt MJ; Blondeel PN; Morrison CM; Albrecht JA
Br J Plast Surg; 2005 Jun; 58(4):493-7. PubMed ID: 15897033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
