318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24167010)
1. Validation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) in a Dutch population.
Utomo E; Korfage IJ; Wildhagen MF; Steensma AB; Bangma CH; Blok BF
Neurourol Urodyn; 2015 Jan; 34(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 24167010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and validation of the Polish version of the Urogenital Distress Inventory short form and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form.
Skorupska KA; Miotla P; Kubik-Komar A; Skorupski P; Rechberger T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():171-174. PubMed ID: 28633095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the short forms of the incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ-7) and the urogenital distress inventory (UDI-6) in a Turkish population.
Cam C; Sakalli M; Ay P; Cam M; Karateke A
Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(1):129-33. PubMed ID: 17083117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Arabic validation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory and Adapted Incontinence Impact Questionnaires--short forms.
El-Azab AS; Mascha EJ
Neurourol Urodyn; 2009; 28(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 18671300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Validation of the Spanish version of the short forms of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) in pregnant women].
Ruiz de Viñaspre Hernández R; Tomás Aznar C; Rubio Aranda E
Gac Sanit; 2011; 25(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 21871693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the Swedish version of the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory.
Franzén K; Johansson JE; Karlsson J; Nilsson K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 May; 92(5):555-61. PubMed ID: 22686542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory: a revisit of their validity in women without a urodynamic diagnosis.
Harvey MA; Kristjansson B; Griffith D; Versi E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jul; 185(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 11483899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing quality of life in obstetric fistula patients: Validation of the urogenital distress inventory (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) in Lingala and Kikongo in DR Congo.
Loposso MN; Ndundu J; Mbunzu D; Matala T; Punga AM; De Ridder D
Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Sep; 38(7):1994-2000. PubMed ID: 31321812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Arabic (Tunisian) translation and validation of the Urogenital Distress Inventory short form (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form (IIQ-7).
Ghroubi S; El Fani N; Elarem S; Alila S; Ben Ayed H; Borgi O; Chmak J; Elleuch MH
Arab J Urol; 2020; 18(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 32082631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring health-related quality of life in women with urogenital dysfunction: the urogenital distress inventory and incontinence impact questionnaire revisited.
van der Vaart CH; de Leeuw JR; Roovers JP; Heintz AP
Neurourol Urodyn; 2003; 22(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 12579625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation survey of the impact of urinary incontinence (IIQ-7) and inventory of distress urogenital (UDI-6) - the short scales - in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Stievano LP; Olival GS; Silva RA; Toller VB; Carabetta EG; da Cunha ET; Moreira Rde J; Eloi M; Tilbery CP
Arq Neuropsiquiatr; 2015 Jan; 73(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 25608127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chinese validation of Urogenital Distress Inventory and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form.
Chan SS; Choy KW; Lee BP; Pang SM; Yip SK; Lee LL; Cheung RY; Yiu AK; Chung TK
Int Urogynecol J; 2010 Jul; 21(7):807-12. PubMed ID: 20169332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Test-retest reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the urogenital distress inventory and the incontinence impact questionnaire.
Hagen S; Hanley J; Capewell A
Neurourol Urodyn; 2002; 21(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 12382243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identification of the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 cutoff scores in urinary incontinent women.
Skorupska K; Grzybowska ME; Kubik-Komar A; Rechberger T; Miotla P
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Mar; 19(1):87. PubMed ID: 33726776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Construct validity of the incontinence severity index.
Murphy M; Culligan PJ; Arce CM; Graham CA; Blackwell L; Heit MH
Neurourol Urodyn; 2006; 25(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16652379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders.
Barber MD; Kuchibhatla MN; Pieper CF; Bump RC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 185(6):1388-95. PubMed ID: 11744914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the Hebrew version of the short form of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6).
Reuven Y; Yohay Z; Glinter H; Yohai D; Weintraub AY
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1891-1894. PubMed ID: 28386708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and validity of the Turkish King's Health Questionnaire in women with urinary incontinence.
Kaya S; Akbayrak T; Toprak Çelenay Ş; Dolgun A; Ekici G; Beksaç S
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Dec; 26(12):1853-9. PubMed ID: 26209953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term patient satisfaction following cadaveric pubovaginal sling incontinence surgery using the UDI and IIQ-7 questionnaires.
Pianezza ML; Joffe R; Chugh T; Radomski SB
Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 16998860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient reported outcomes tools in an observational study of female stress urinary incontinence.
van de Vaart H; Falconer C; Quail D; Timlin L; Manning M; Tincello D; Tunn R
Neurourol Urodyn; 2010 Mar; 29(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 19283868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
