212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24167778)
1. Citations and the h index of soil researchers and journals in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
Minasny B; Hartemink AE; McBratney A; Jang HJ
PeerJ; 2013; 1():e183. PubMed ID: 24167778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals.
Kulkarni AV; Aziz B; Shams I; Busse JW
JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(10):1092-6. PubMed ID: 19738094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Croatian Medical Journal citation score in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
Sember M; Utrobicić A; Petrak J
Croat Med J; 2010 Apr; 51(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 20401951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Google Scholar and the h-index in biomedicine: the popularization of bibliometric assessment].
Cabezas-Clavijo A; Delgado-López-Cózar E
Med Intensiva; 2013; 37(5):343-54. PubMed ID: 23517697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The difference in referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
Anker MS; Hadzibegovic S; Lena A; Haverkamp W
ESC Heart Fail; 2019 Dec; 6(6):1291-1312. PubMed ID: 31886636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do bibliometric findings differ between Medline, Google Scholar and Web of Science? Bibliometry of publications after oral presentation to the 2013 and 2014 French Society of Arthroscopy (SFA) Congresses.
Villatte G; Marcheix PS; Antoni M; Devos P; Descamps S; Boisgard S; Erivan R
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 106(8):1469-1473. PubMed ID: 33153959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science.
Bakkalbasi N; Bauer K; Glover J; Wang L
Biomed Digit Libr; 2006 Jun; 3():7. PubMed ID: 16805916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation rates: a case study of medical physics and biomedical engineering: what gets cited and what doesn't?
Trapp J
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2016 Dec; 39(4):817-823. PubMed ID: 27578318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Citation Analysis of the Korean Journal of Urology From Web of Science, Scopus, Korean Medical Citation Index, KoreaMed Synapse, and Google Scholar.
Huh S
Korean J Urol; 2013 Apr; 54(4):220-8. PubMed ID: 23614057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Part II: Should the h-index be modified? An analysis of the m-quotient, contemporary h-index, authorship value, and impact factor.
Khan NR; Thompson CJ; Taylor DR; Gabrick KS; Choudhri AF; Boop FR; Klimo P
World Neurosurg; 2013 Dec; 80(6):766-74. PubMed ID: 23886815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Half a century of ANALES DE PEDIATRÍA. Evolution of its main bibliometric indicators in the Web of Science and Scopus international databases].
González de Dios J; Alonso-Arroyo A; Aleixandre-Benavent R
An Pediatr (Engl Ed); 2019 Mar; 90(3):194.e1-194.e11. PubMed ID: 30777718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact factor of an open access journal does not contribute to an article's citations.
Chua SK; Qureshi AM; Krishnan V; Pai DR; Kamal LB; Gunasegaran S; Afzal MZ; Ambawatta L; Gan JY; Kew PY; Winn T; Sood S
F1000Res; 2017; 6():208. PubMed ID: 28649365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [New bibliometric indicators for the scientific literature: an evolving panorama].
La Torre G; Sciarra I; Chiappetta M; Monteduro A
Clin Ter; 2017; 168(2):e65-e71. PubMed ID: 28383616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.
Falagas ME; Pitsouni EI; Malietzis GA; Pappas G
FASEB J; 2008 Feb; 22(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 17884971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact factor and other indices to assess science, scientists and scientific journals.
Satyanarayana K
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2010; 54(3):197-212. PubMed ID: 21409860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring academic performance for healthcare researchers with the H index: which search tool should be used?
Patel VM; Ashrafian H; Almoudaris A; Makanjuola J; Bucciarelli-Ducci C; Darzi A; Athanasiou T
Med Princ Pract; 2013; 22(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 22964880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bibliometric analysis of anaesthesia journal editorial board members: correlation between journal impact factor and the median h-index of its board members.
Pagel PS; Hudetz JA
Br J Anaesth; 2011 Sep; 107(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 21700614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing.
De Groote SL; Raszewski R
Nurs Outlook; 2012; 60(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 22748758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations' COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations.
Martín-Martín A; Thelwall M; Orduna-Malea E; Delgado López-Cózar E
Scientometrics; 2021; 126(1):871-906. PubMed ID: 32981987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A bibliometric analysis of research productivity of emergency medicine researchers in South Korea.
Choi J; You JS; Joo YS; Kong T; Ko DR; Chung SP
Clin Exp Emerg Med; 2016 Dec; 3(4):245-251. PubMed ID: 28168231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
