1110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24168099)
1. Emergency endoscopy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: prognostic value of endoscopic hemostasis and the AIMS65 score in Japanese patients.
Nakamura S; Matsumoto T; Sugimori H; Esaki M; Kitazono T; Hashizume M
Dig Endosc; 2014 May; 26(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 24168099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Urgent vs. non-urgent endoscopy in stable acute variceal bleeding.
Cheung J; Soo I; Bastiampillai R; Zhu Q; Ma M
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 May; 104(5):1125-9. PubMed ID: 19337243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Pre-endoscopic assessment to predict outcome of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding--a retrospective study in patients subject to emergency endoscopy outside regular working hours].
Giese A; Grunwald C; Zieren J; Büchner NJ; Henning BF
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2013 May; 138(21):1096-101. PubMed ID: 23677503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.
Budimir I; Gradišer M; Nikolić M; Baršić N; Ljubičić N; Kralj D; Budimir I
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison between Glascow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru].
Espinoza-Ríos J; Aguilar Sánchez V; Bravo Paredes EA; Pinto Valdivia J; Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J
Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2016; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 27409091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding.
Hyett BH; Abougergi MS; Charpentier JP; Kumar NL; Brozovic S; Claggett BL; Travis AC; Saltzman JR
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Apr; 77(4):551-7. PubMed ID: 23357496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
Shafaghi A; Gharibpoor F; Mahdipour Z; Samadani AA
Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity of the Pre-endoscopic Scoring Systems for the Prediction of the Failure of Endoscopic Hemostasis in Bleeding Gastroduodenal Peptic Ulcers.
Iino C; Shimoyama T; Igarashi T; Aihara T; Ishii K; Sakamoto J; Tono H; Fukuda S
Intern Med; 2018 May; 57(10):1355-1360. PubMed ID: 29321420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Park SM; Yeum SC; Kim BW; Kim JS; Kim JH; Sim EH; Ji JS; Choi H
Gut Liver; 2016 Jul; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
Chen IC; Hung MS; Chiu TF; Chen JC; Hsiao CT
Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep; 25(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 17870480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity of modified early warning, Glasgow Blatchford, and pre-endoscopic Rockall scores in predicting prognosis of patients presenting to emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Bozkurt S; Köse A; Arslan ED; Erdoğan S; Üçbilek E; Çevik İ; Ayrık C; Sezgin O
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2015 Dec; 23():109. PubMed ID: 26714636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does the AIMS65, a new risk score for upper gastrointestinal bleeding, work in Japan?
Masaoka T; Suzuki H
Dig Endosc; 2014 May; 26(3):331-2. PubMed ID: 24754239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic treatment of esophagogastric variceal bleeding in patients with noncirrhotic extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis: a long-term follow-up study.
Spaander MC; Darwish Murad S; van Buuren HR; Hansen BE; Kuipers EJ; Janssen HL
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 May; 67(6):821-7. PubMed ID: 18206153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment and prognosis in peptic ulcer bleeding.
Laursen SB
Dan Med J; 2014 Jan; 61(1):B4797. PubMed ID: 24547604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kalkan Ç; Soykan I; Karakaya F; Tüzün A; Gençtürk ZB
Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A survey on mortality from non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Is the emergency referral system adequate?
Cesaro P; Kohn A; Petruziello L; Angelico M; Franceschi F; Gigliozzi A; Lamazza A; Tammaro L; Boschetto S; Brighi S; Antoniozzi A; Baiocchi L
Dig Liver Dis; 2013 Nov; 45(11):953-6. PubMed ID: 23746421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
