These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24168203)

  • 1. The effect of manipulability and religion on the multisensory integration of objects in peripersonal space.
    van Elk M
    Cogn Neurosci; 2014; 5(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 24168203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Manipulable objects facilitate cross-modal integration in peripersonal space.
    van Elk M; Blanke O
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e24641. PubMed ID: 21949738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task.
    Spence C; Pavani F; Maravita A; Holmes N
    J Physiol Paris; 2004; 98(1-3):171-89. PubMed ID: 15477031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating the effect of a transparent barrier on the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Kitagawa N; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 161(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 15688177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Others' actions reduce crossmodal integration in peripersonal space.
    Heed T; Habets B; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    Curr Biol; 2010 Aug; 20(15):1345-9. PubMed ID: 20619649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Manipulability and object recognition: is manipulability a semantic feature?
    Campanella F; Shallice T
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Feb; 208(3):369-83. PubMed ID: 21113583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motor resources in peripersonal space are intrinsic to spatial encoding: evidence from motor interference.
    Iachini T; Ruggiero G; Ruotolo F; Vinciguerra M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():20-7. PubMed ID: 25262059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. EEG μ rhythm in virtual reality reveals that motor coding of visual objects in peripersonal space is task dependent.
    Wamain Y; Gabrielli F; Coello Y
    Cortex; 2016 Jan; 74():20-30. PubMed ID: 26606301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Grasping actions remap peripersonal space.
    Brozzoli C; Pavani F; Urquizar C; Cardinali L; Farnè A
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jul; 20(10):913-7. PubMed ID: 19512951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Staying within the lines: the formation of visuospatial boundaries influences multisensory feature integration.
    Fiebelkorn IC; Foxe JJ; Schwartz TH; Molholm S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(10):1737-43. PubMed ID: 20584177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objects and their nouns in peripersonal space.
    Ferri F; Riggio L; Gallese V; Costantini M
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Nov; 49(13):3519-24. PubMed ID: 21925191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. I feel who I see: visual body identity affects visual-tactile integration in peripersonal space.
    Salomon R; van Elk M; Aspell JE; Blanke O
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Sep; 21(3):1355-64. PubMed ID: 22832215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The multisensory attentional consequences of tool use: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Holmes NP; Spence C; Hansen PC; Mackay CE; Calvert GA
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3502. PubMed ID: 18958150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No role for motor affordances in visual working memory.
    Pecher D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 22612171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect.
    Shore DI; Barnes ME; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 392(1-2):96-100. PubMed ID: 16213655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Crossmodal congruency measures of lateral distance effects on the rubber hand illusion.
    Zopf R; Savage G; Williams MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Feb; 48(3):713-25. PubMed ID: 19913040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overt spatial attention modulates multisensory selection.
    Jensen A; Merz S; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):174-188. PubMed ID: 30589358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Action-specific remapping of peripersonal space.
    Brozzoli C; Cardinali L; Pavani F; Farnè A
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Feb; 48(3):796-802. PubMed ID: 19837102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Empathy as a predictor of peripersonal space: Evidence from the crossmodal congruency task.
    Gherri E; Theocharopoulos M; Browne N; Duran N; Austin EJ
    Conscious Cogn; 2022 Feb; 98():103267. PubMed ID: 34998269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.