These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24168320)

  • 41. No effect of environmental heterogeneity on the maintenance of genetic variation in wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Yeaman S; Chen Y; Whitlock MC
    Evolution; 2010 Dec; 64(12):3398-408. PubMed ID: 20624178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity and environmental tolerance of a labile quantitative character in a fluctuating environment.
    Lande R
    J Evol Biol; 2014 May; 27(5):866-75. PubMed ID: 24724972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Fatty acid composition and extreme temperature tolerance following exposure to fluctuating temperatures in a soil arthropod.
    van Dooremalen C; Suring W; Ellers J
    J Insect Physiol; 2011 Sep; 57(9):1267-73. PubMed ID: 21704631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Quantification and decomposition of environment-selection relationships.
    Hunter DC; Pemberton JM; Pilkington JG; Morrissey MB
    Evolution; 2018 Apr; 72(4):851-866. PubMed ID: 29518255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Genotype by environment interaction for gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Huang W; Carbone MA; Lyman RF; Anholt RRH; Mackay TFC
    Nat Commun; 2020 Oct; 11(1):5451. PubMed ID: 33116142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Importance of adaptation and genotype × environment interactions in tropical beef breeding systems.
    Burrow HM
    Animal; 2012 May; 6(5):729-40. PubMed ID: 22558921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XX. Comparison of genotype-environment interaction in viability between a northern and a southern population.
    Takano T; Kusakabe S; Mukai T
    Genetics; 1987 Oct; 117(2):245-54. PubMed ID: 3117620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Latitudinal and voltinism compensation shape thermal reaction norms for growth rate.
    Shama LN; Campero-Paz M; Wegner KM; DE Block M; Stoks R
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Jul; 20(14):2929-41. PubMed ID: 21689189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Low evolutionary potential for egg-to-adult viability in Drosophila melanogaster at high temperatures.
    Kristensen TN; Overgaard J; Lassen J; Hoffmann AA; Sgrò C
    Evolution; 2015 Mar; 69(3):803-14. PubMed ID: 25644054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Developmental acclimation affects clinal variation in stress resistance traits in Drosophila buzzatii.
    Sarup P; Loeschcke V
    J Evol Biol; 2010 May; 23(5):957-65. PubMed ID: 20298441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Experimental test of the effects of fluctuating incubation temperatures on hatchling phenotype.
    Les HL; Paitz RT; Bowden RM
    J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol; 2007 May; 307(5):274-80. PubMed ID: 17377950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Maintenance of genetic variation in phenotypic plasticity: the role of environmental variation.
    de Jong G; Gavrilets S
    Genet Res; 2000 Dec; 76(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 11204976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Analysis of milk production traits in early lactation using a reaction norm model with unknown covariates.
    Shariati MM; Su G; Madsen P; Sorensen D
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Dec; 90(12):5759-66. PubMed ID: 18024770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Environmental variation partitioned into separate heritable components.
    Ørsted M; Rohde PD; Hoffmann AA; Sørensen P; Kristensen TN
    Evolution; 2018 Jan; 72(1):136-152. PubMed ID: 29125643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of acclimation time and epigenetic mechanisms on growth of Neurospora in fluctuating environments.
    Kronholm I; Ketola T
    Heredity (Edinb); 2018 Oct; 121(4):327-341. PubMed ID: 30143790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Optimizing design to estimate genetic correlations between environments with common environmental effects.
    Lozano-Jaramillo M; Komen H; Wientjes YCJ; Mulder HA; Bastiaansen JWM
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Feb; 98(2):. PubMed ID: 32017843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Stress and metabolic regulation in Drosophila.
    Clark AG
    EXS; 1997; 83():117-32. PubMed ID: 9342846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Ecological specialization in populations adapted to constant versus heterogeneous environments.
    Wang A; Singh A; Huang Y; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2019 Jun; 73(6):1309-1317. PubMed ID: 30912125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Developmental plasticity evolved according to specialist-generalist trade-offs in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Le Vinh Thuy J; VandenBrooks JM; Angilletta MJ
    Biol Lett; 2016 Jul; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 27405382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. GENETICS OF HOST-CACTUS RESPONSE AND LIFE-HISTORY EVOLUTION AMONG ANCESTRAL AND DERIVED POPULATIONS OF CACTOPHILIC DROSOPHILA MOJAVENSIS.
    Etges WJ
    Evolution; 1993 Jun; 47(3):750-767. PubMed ID: 28567893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.