402 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24169068)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: apparent diffusion coefficients from multiexponential analysis of b values greater than 50 s/mm2 do not respond to caloric intake despite increased portal-venous blood flow.
Pazahr S; Nanz D; Rossi C; Chuck N; Stenger I; Wurnig MC; Schick F; Boss A
Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):138-46. PubMed ID: 24169068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of Liver Perfusion by IntraVoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) Magnetic Resonance-Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Correlation With Phase-Contrast Portal Venous Flow Measurements.
Regini F; Colagrande S; Mazzoni LN; Busoni S; Matteuzzi B; Santini P; Wyttenbach R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):365-72. PubMed ID: 25700227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of noncirrhotic hepatic parenchyma with and without significant portal vein stenosis using diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR on the basis of multiple-perfusion-components theory.
Moteki T; Horikoshi H
Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Jan; 29(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 20833499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diffusion-sensitized ophthalmic magnetic resonance imaging free of geometric distortion at 3.0 and 7.0 T: a feasibility study in healthy subjects and patients with intraocular masses.
Paul K; Graessl A; Rieger J; Lysiak D; Huelnhagen T; Winter L; Heidemann R; Lindner T; Hadlich S; Zimpfer A; Pohlmann A; Endemann B; Krüger PC; Langner S; Stachs O; Niendorf T
Invest Radiol; 2015 May; 50(5):309-21. PubMed ID: 25612144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between two-point and four-point methods for quantification of apparent diffusion coefficient of normal liver parenchyma and focal lesions. Value of normalization with spleen.
Papanikolaou N; Gourtsoyianni S; Yarmenitis S; Maris T; Gourtsoyiannis N
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):305-9. PubMed ID: 19091503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the prostate: Comparison of b1000 and b2000 image sets for index lesion detection.
Rosenkrantz AB; Hindman N; Lim RP; Das K; Babb JS; Mussi TC; Taneja SS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 23371846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Liver imaging at 3.0 T: diffusion-induced black-blood echo-planar imaging with large anatomic volumetric coverage as an alternative for specific absorption rate-intensive echo-train spin-echo sequences: feasibility study.
van den Bos IC; Hussain SM; Krestin GP; Wielopolski PA
Radiology; 2008 Jul; 248(1):264-71. PubMed ID: 18566178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ADC measurement of abdominal organs and lesions using parallel imaging technique.
Yoshikawa T; Kawamitsu H; Mitchell DG; Ohno Y; Ku Y; Seo Y; Fujii M; Sugimura K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1521-30. PubMed ID: 17114546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the prostate: an apparent diffusion coefficient comparison of half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo and echo planar imaging.
Babourina-Brooks B; Cowin GJ; Wang D
Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Feb; 30(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 22055748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lymphomas and glioblastomas: differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient evaluated with high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.
Doskaliyev A; Yamasaki F; Ohtaki M; Kajiwara Y; Takeshima Y; Watanabe Y; Takayasu T; Amatya VJ; Akiyama Y; Sugiyama K; Kurisu K
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 21129872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for characterization of focal liver masses: impact of parallel imaging (SENSE) and b value.
Erturk SM; Ichikawa T; Sano K; Motosugi U; Sou H; Araki T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 19204445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of benign and malignant breast lesions before and after contrast enhancement.
Janka R; Hammon M; Geppert C; Nothhelfer A; Uder M; Wenkel E
Rofo; 2014 Feb; 186(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 23929263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Field strength and diffusion encoding technique affect the apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen.
Dale BM; Braithwaite AC; Boll DT; Merkle EM
Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 20027117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of benign hepatocellular lesions: quantitative and qualitative analysis.
Agnello F; Ronot M; Valla DC; Sinkus R; Van Beers BE; Vilgrain V
Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):511-9. PubMed ID: 22143926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.
Cakir O; Arslan A; Inan N; Anık Y; Sarısoy T; Gumustas S; Akansel G
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e801-6. PubMed ID: 24099642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diffusion analysis with triexponential function in liver cirrhosis.
Hayashi T; Miyati T; Takahashi J; Fukuzawa K; Sakai H; Tano M; Saitoh S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jul; 38(1):148-53. PubMed ID: 23239543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of normal brain at 3T.
Cihangiroglu M; Uluğ AM; Firat Z; Bayram A; Kovanlikaya A; Kovanlikaya I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):454-8. PubMed ID: 18162352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of perfusion on hepatic MR diffusion measurement.
Hollingsworth KG; Lomas DJ
NMR Biomed; 2006 Apr; 19(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 16538673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of malignancy and characterization of hepatic tumor type with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion-derived measurements.
Doblas S; Wagner M; Leitao HS; Daire JL; Sinkus R; Vilgrain V; Van Beers BE
Invest Radiol; 2013 Oct; 48(10):722-8. PubMed ID: 23669588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Apparent diffusion coefficient for prostate cancer imaging: impact of B values.
Peng Y; Jiang Y; Antic T; Sethi I; Schmid-Tannwald C; Eggener S; Oto A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):W247-53. PubMed ID: 24555621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
