These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24169419)

  • 1. Extending the olive branch.
    McMurphy S; Lewis J; Boulos P
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2013 Oct; 8(4):29-36. PubMed ID: 24169419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Walking along beside the researcher": how Canadian REBs/IRBs are responding to the needs of community-based participatory research.
    Guta A; Nixon S; Gahagan J; Fielden S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Feb; 7(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 22378131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Getting through ethics: the fit between research ethics board assessments and qualitative research.
    McCormack D; Carr T; McCloskey R; Keeping-Burke L; Furlong KE; Doucet S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Dec; 7(5):30-6. PubMed ID: 23324201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human research ethics committees: examining their roles and practices.
    Guillemin M; Gillam L; Rosenthal D; Bolitho A
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Jul; 7(3):38-49. PubMed ID: 22850142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical issues in the reuse of qualitative data: perspectives from literature, practice, and participants.
    Yardley SJ; Watts KM; Pearson J; Richardson JC
    Qual Health Res; 2014 Jan; 24(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 24374332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Protecting" or "Policing": Academic Researchers' View of IRBs in an Arab Context.
    Makhoul J; El-Alti L; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Sakr C; Nakkash R; Alali K
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Dec; 9(5):25-35. PubMed ID: 25747688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the ethical review process in Sudan.
    Elsayed DE; Kass NE
    Dev World Bioeth; 2007 Dec; 7(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 18021119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationships between community-based processes for research ethics review and institution-based IRBs: a national study.
    Shore N; Drew E; Brazauskas R; Seifer SD
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2011 Jun; 6(2):13-21. PubMed ID: 21680973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Data and tissue research without patient consent: A qualitative study of the views of research ethics committees in New Zealand.
    Ballantyne A; Moore A
    AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):143-153. PubMed ID: 30407144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human research ethics in practice: deliberative strategies, processes and perceptions.
    Gillam L; Guillemin M; Bolitho A; Rosenthal D
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2009 Mar; 28(1):7.1-17. PubMed ID: 19839277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resources employed by health researchers to ensure ethical research practice.
    Guillemin M; Gillam L; Rosenthal D; Bolitho A
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2010 Jun; 5(2):21-34. PubMed ID: 20569147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Canadian policy on reporting breaches of research integrity: When should Research Ethics Boards be informed?
    Page SA; Stalker MA
    Account Res; 2019 Oct; 26(7):460-471. PubMed ID: 31462108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Resisting the seduction of "ethics creep": using Foucault to surface complexity and contradiction in research ethics review.
    Guta A; Nixon SA; Wilson MG
    Soc Sci Med; 2013 Dec; 98():301-10. PubMed ID: 23063216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What Can IRBs Learn From CABs? A Qualitative Analysis of the Experiences of Recruitment and Training of Nonscientist Members on Research Review Boards.
    Solomon Cargill S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Feb; 13(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 29226746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
    Klitzman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perspectives of Singaporean biomedical researchers and research support staff on actual and ideal IRB review functions and characteristics: A quantitative analysis.
    Labude MK; Shen L; Zhu Y; Schaefer GO; Ong C; Xafis V
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0241783. PubMed ID: 33382683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A relational ethical dialogue with research ethics committees.
    Larkin PJ; de Casterlé BD; Schotsmans P
    Nurs Ethics; 2008 Mar; 15(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 18272613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is mandatory research ethics reviewing ethical?
    Dyck M; Allen G
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Aug; 39(8):517-20. PubMed ID: 22865925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How ethics committees and requirements are structuring health research in the Philippines: a qualitative study.
    Lasco G; Yu VG; Palileo-Villanueva L
    BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Jul; 22(1):85. PubMed ID: 34210301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Health researchers' views of ethics committee functioning in New Zealand.
    Paul C
    N Z Med J; 2000 Jun; 113(1111):210-4. PubMed ID: 10909934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.