127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24169601)
1. Dear DORA.
Jacobs H
EMBO Rep; 2013 Nov; 14(11):947. PubMed ID: 24169601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How does the journal impact factor affect the CV of PhD students?
Sanchis-Gomar F
EMBO Rep; 2014 Mar; 15(3):207. PubMed ID: 24473241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments.
Ploegh H
Nature; 2011 Apr; 472(7344):391. PubMed ID: 21525890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Why we should reward peer reviewers.
Maffia P
Cardiovasc Res; 2018 Apr; 114(5):e30-e31. PubMed ID: 29590390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review: recognition via year-end statements.
van Loon AJ
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):116. PubMed ID: 12736656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Confidential reports may improve peer review.
Cintas P
Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6980):255. PubMed ID: 15029169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact factors reward and promote excellence.
Lomnicki A
Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):487. PubMed ID: 12891329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact factors: target the funding bodies.
Insall R
Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):585. PubMed ID: 12789312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Transparency showcases strength of peer review.
Pulverer B
Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7320):29-31. PubMed ID: 21048742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reviewers' reports should in turn be peer reviewed.
List A
Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7098):26. PubMed ID: 16823432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Citation rate unrelated to journals' impact factors.
Waheed AA
Nature; 2003 Dec; 426(6966):495. PubMed ID: 14654813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scandals stem from the low priority of peer review.
Connerade JP
Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6971):196. PubMed ID: 14724609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The system rewards a dishonest approach.
Brookfield J
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):480; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Three cheers for peers.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The politics of publication.
Lawrence PA
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Any jackass can trash a manuscript, but it takes good scholarship to create one (how MBoC promotes civil and constructive peer review).
Drubin DG
Mol Biol Cell; 2011 Mar; 22(5):525-7. PubMed ID: 21357757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Time to remodel the journal impact factor.
Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7613):466. PubMed ID: 27466089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. H-index and impact factors: assessing the clinical impact of researchers and specialist journals.
Sebire NJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Dec; 32(7):843-5. PubMed ID: 19035541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Commentaries on peer review and the evolving journal.
Freeman MP
J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1598. PubMed ID: 20031099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Using the impact factor and H index to assess researchers and publications.
Thomaz PG; Assad RS; Moreira LF
Arq Bras Cardiol; 2011 Feb; 96(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 21445465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
