131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24170226)
1. Comparison of the POP-Q examination, transvaginal ultrasound, and direct anatomic measurement of cervical length.
Dancz CE; Werth L; Sun V; Lee S; Walker D; Özel B
Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Apr; 25(4):457-64. PubMed ID: 24170226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of cervical length measured by POP-Q C-D and MRI: Why is POP-Q C-D not accurate?
Tang L; Liao K; Jiang W; Feng J; Liu P; Chen C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():76-80. PubMed ID: 31760266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Putting POP-Q to the test: does C - D = cervical length?
Williams KS; Rosen L; Pilkinton ML; Dhariwal L; Winkler HA
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):881-885. PubMed ID: 28871354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic value of preoperative ultrasonography, cervical length measurement, and POP-Q examination in cervical elongation estimation.
Alay I; Kaya C; Karaca I; Yildiz S; Cengiz H; Ekin M; Yasar L
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Dec; 31(12):2617-2623. PubMed ID: 32653969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Defining Cervical Elongation: A Prospective Observational Study.
Nosti PA; Gutman RE; Iglesia CB; Park AJ; Tefera E; Sokol AI
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Apr; 39(4):223-228. PubMed ID: 28413041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is cervical elongation associated with pelvic organ prolapse?
Berger MB; Ramanah R; Guire KE; DeLancey JO
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Aug; 23(8):1095-103. PubMed ID: 22527546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Association between ICS POP-Q coordinates and translabial ultrasound findings: implications for definition of 'normal pelvic organ support'.
Dietz HP; Kamisan Atan I; Salita A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 47(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 25854801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical Risk Factors for Uterine Cervical Elongation among Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Liu YY; Wang CL; Loo ZX; Lin KL; Long CY
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(17):. PubMed ID: 34501846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of assessing Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification points using dynamic 2D transperineal ultrasound in women with pelvic organ prolapse.
Lone FW; Thakar R; Sultan AH; Stankiewicz A
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1555-60. PubMed ID: 22543548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of episiotomy on pelvic organ prolapse assessed by pelvic organ prolapse quantification system.
Aytan H; Tok EC; Ertunc D; Yasa O
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Feb; 173():34-7. PubMed ID: 24314799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differential gene expression of extracellular-matrix-related proteins in the vaginal apical compartment of women with pelvic organ prolapse.
Wang H; Kira Y; Hamuro A; Takase A; Tachibana D; Koyama M
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Mar; 30(3):439-446. PubMed ID: 29600404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to quantify pelvic organ prolapse: reliability of assessment and correlation with clinical findings and pelvic floor symptoms.
Lakeman MM; Zijta FM; Peringa J; Nederveen AJ; Stoker J; Roovers JP
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1547-54. PubMed ID: 22531955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Study of Prolapse-Induced Cervical Elongation.
Geoffrion R; Louie K; Hyakutake MT; Koenig NA; Lee T; Filipenko JD
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Mar; 38(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 27106197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic classification of uterine cervical elongation in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
Mothes AR; Mothes H; Fröber R; Radosa MP; Runnebaum IB
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 May; 200():40-4. PubMed ID: 26967345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agreement and reliability of pelvic floor measurements during rest and on maximum Valsalva maneuver using three-dimensional translabial ultrasound and virtual reality imaging.
Speksnijder L; Oom DM; Koning AH; Biesmeijer CS; Steegers EA; Steensma AB
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 48(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 26483139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Manchester Operation: An Effective Treatment for Uterine Prolapse Caused by True Cervical Elongation.
Park YJ; Kong MK; Lee J; Kim EH; Bai SW
Yonsei Med J; 2019 Nov; 60(11):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 31637890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship of degree of uterine prolapse between pelvic examination in lithotomy position with cervical traction and pelvic examination in standing position.
Leerasiri P; Wachasiddhisilpa P; Hengrasmee P; Asumpinwong C
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1173-1177. PubMed ID: 29508045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of transperineal ultrasound with POP-Q for assessing symptoms of prolapse.
Volløyhaug I; Rojas RG; Mørkved S; Salvesen KÅ
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):595-602. PubMed ID: 30069728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital assessment and quantification of pelvic organ prolapse (DPOP-Q): a randomised cross-over diagnostic agreement trial.
Thiagamoorthy G; Zacchè M; Cardozo L; Naidu M; Giarenis I; Flint R; Srikrishna S; Robinson D
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Mar; 27(3):433-7. PubMed ID: 26423265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pelvic floor imaging with MR defecography: correlation with gynecologic pelvic organ prolapse quantification.
Swamy N; Bajaj G; Olliphant SS; Henry JA; Jambhekar K; Pandey T; Ram R
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Apr; 46(4):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 32211947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
