These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24170798)

  • 21. Evaluation of physical properties of different digital intraoral sensors.
    Al-Rawi W; Teich S
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Sep; 34(8):e76-83. PubMed ID: 24568289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relationship between histological and radiographic caries lesion depth measured in images from four digital radiography systems.
    Jacobsen JH; Hansen B; Wenzel A; Hintze H
    Caries Res; 2004; 38(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 14684975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of complementary metal oxide semiconductor and charge-coupled device intraoral X-ray detectors using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 15070845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prediction of perceptibility curves of direct digital intraoral radiographic systems.
    Yoshiura K; Stamatakis HC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Shi XQ; Ban S; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jul; 28(4):224-31. PubMed ID: 10455386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stationary intraoral digital tomosynthesis using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.
    Shan J; Tucker AW; Gaalaas LR; Wu G; Platin E; Mol A; Lu J; Zhou O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(9):20150098. PubMed ID: 26090933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of differences in pixel size on image characteristics of digital intraoral radiographic systems: a physical and visual evaluation.
    Kuramoto T; Takarabe S; Okamura K; Shiotsuki K; Shibayama Y; Tsuru H; Akamine H; Tatsumi M; Kato T; Morishita J; Yoshiura K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Sep; 49(6):20190378. PubMed ID: 32302229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detection of proximal caries with high-resolution and standard resolution digital radiographic systems.
    Berkhout WE; Verheij JG; Syriopoulos K; Li G; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 May; 36(4):204-10. PubMed ID: 17536087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative investigation of subjective image quality of digital intraoral radiographs processed with 3 image-processing algorithms.
    Li G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Jun; 97(6):762-7. PubMed ID: 15184861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A simplified method to obtain perceptibility curves for direct dental digital radiography.
    Stamatakis HC; Yoshiura K; Shi XQ; Welander U; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):112-5. PubMed ID: 10522200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceptibility of defects in an aluminum test object: a comparison of the RVG-S and first generation VIXA systems with and without added niobium filtration.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kelly MS; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):211-4. PubMed ID: 9161163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Correction for attenuation and visual response in digital radiography.
    Welande U; Yoshiura K; Li G; Sällström P; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 12076052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of beam energy and filtration on the signal-to-noise ratio of the Dexis intraoral X-ray detector.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 15140818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Basic technical properties of a system for direct acquisition of digital intraoral radiographs.
    Welander U; Nelvig P; Tronje G; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Mörner AC; Cederlund T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Apr; 75(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 8464618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A perceptibility curve comparison of Ultra-speed and Ektaspeed Plus films.
    Tjelmeland EM; Moore WS; Hermesch CB; Buikema DJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Apr; 85(4):485-8. PubMed ID: 9574962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comprehensive in vitro study of image accuracy and quality for periodontal diagnosis. Part 1: the influence of X-ray generator on periodontal measurements using conventional and digital receptors.
    Vandenberghe B; Corpas L; Bosmans H; Yang J; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Aug; 15(4):537-49. PubMed ID: 20443035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison of two intraoral CCD sensor systems in terms of image quality and interobserver agreement.
    Schulze D; Rother UJ; Fuhrmann AW; Tietke M
    Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Apr; 6(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 14552151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Detection of cavitated or non-cavitated approximal enamel caries lesions using CMOS and CCD digital X-ray sensors and conventional D and F-speed films at different exposure conditions.
    Bottenberg P; Jacquet W; Stachniss V; Wellnitz J; Schulte AG
    Am J Dent; 2011 Apr; 24(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 21698985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.