These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24171942)

  • 1. The effect of genomic information on optimal contribution selection in livestock breeding programs.
    Clark SA; Kinghorn BP; Hickey JM; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):44. PubMed ID: 24171942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genotyping more cows increases genetic gain and reduces rate of true inbreeding in a dairy cattle breeding scheme using female reproductive technologies.
    Thomasen JR; Liu H; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):597-606. PubMed ID: 31733861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the impact of natural service bulls and genotype by environment interactions on genetic gain and inbreeding in organic dairy cattle genomic breeding programs.
    Yin T; Wensch-Dorendorf M; Simianer H; Swalve HH; König S
    Animal; 2014 Jun; 8(6):877-86. PubMed ID: 24703184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
    Carthy TR; McCarthy J; Berry DP
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of rare alleles on estimated genomic relationships from whole genome sequence data.
    Eynard SE; Windig JJ; Leroy G; van Binsbergen R; Calus MP
    BMC Genet; 2015 Mar; 16():24. PubMed ID: 25887220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Controlling inbreeding and maximizing genetic gain using semi-definite programming with pedigree-based and genomic relationships.
    Schierenbeck S; Pimentel EC; Tietze M; Körte J; Reents R; Reinhardt F; Simianer H; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6143-52. PubMed ID: 22118102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic selection requires genomic control of inbreeding.
    Sonesson AK; Woolliams JA; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Aug; 44(1):27. PubMed ID: 22898324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Controlling inbreeding by constraining the average relationship between parents of young bulls entering AI progeny test programs.
    Weigel KA; Lin SW
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Sep; 85(9):2376-83. PubMed ID: 12362471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating inbreeding rate and effective population size in the Finnish Ayrshire population in the era of genomic selection.
    Sarviaho K; Uimari P; Martikainen K
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 May; 140(3):343-353. PubMed ID: 36808142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of kinship matrices on genetic gain and inbreeding with optimum contribution selection in a genomic dairy cattle breeding program.
    Gautason E; Sahana G; Guldbrandtsen B; Berg P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jul; 55(1):48. PubMed ID: 37460999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Novel strategies to minimize progeny inbreeding while maximizing genetic gain using genomic information.
    Pryce JE; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):377-88. PubMed ID: 22192217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.
    Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):9956-9970. PubMed ID: 31495630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
    Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
    Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.
    Seno LO; Guidolin DGF; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Nascimento GBD; Silva TBRD; Oliveira HN; Munari DP
    J Dairy Res; 2018 May; 85(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29785919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of genomic selection on rate of inbreeding and coancestry and effective population size of Holstein and Jersey cattle populations.
    Makanjuola BO; Miglior F; Abdalla EA; Maltecca C; Schenkel FS; Baes CF
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5183-5199. PubMed ID: 32278553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A low-marker density implementation of genomic selection in aquaculture using within-family genomic breeding values.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):39. PubMed ID: 24127852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of genomic selection on genetic diversity and genetic gain in three French dairy cattle breeds.
    Doublet AC; Croiseau P; Fritz S; Michenet A; Hozé C; Danchin-Burge C; Laloë D; Restoux G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Sep; 51(1):52. PubMed ID: 31547802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding.
    Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2214-23. PubMed ID: 19389980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of dairy cattle breeding designs that use genomic selection.
    Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):493-500. PubMed ID: 21183061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.