341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24171942)
1. The effect of genomic information on optimal contribution selection in livestock breeding programs.
Clark SA; Kinghorn BP; Hickey JM; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):44. PubMed ID: 24171942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genotyping more cows increases genetic gain and reduces rate of true inbreeding in a dairy cattle breeding scheme using female reproductive technologies.
Thomasen JR; Liu H; Sørensen AC
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):597-606. PubMed ID: 31733861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the impact of natural service bulls and genotype by environment interactions on genetic gain and inbreeding in organic dairy cattle genomic breeding programs.
Yin T; Wensch-Dorendorf M; Simianer H; Swalve HH; König S
Animal; 2014 Jun; 8(6):877-86. PubMed ID: 24703184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A mating advice system in dairy cattle incorporating genomic information.
Carthy TR; McCarthy J; Berry DP
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8210-8220. PubMed ID: 31229287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of rare alleles on estimated genomic relationships from whole genome sequence data.
Eynard SE; Windig JJ; Leroy G; van Binsbergen R; Calus MP
BMC Genet; 2015 Mar; 16():24. PubMed ID: 25887220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Controlling inbreeding and maximizing genetic gain using semi-definite programming with pedigree-based and genomic relationships.
Schierenbeck S; Pimentel EC; Tietze M; Körte J; Reents R; Reinhardt F; Simianer H; König S
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6143-52. PubMed ID: 22118102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic selection requires genomic control of inbreeding.
Sonesson AK; Woolliams JA; Meuwissen TH
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Aug; 44(1):27. PubMed ID: 22898324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Controlling inbreeding by constraining the average relationship between parents of young bulls entering AI progeny test programs.
Weigel KA; Lin SW
J Dairy Sci; 2002 Sep; 85(9):2376-83. PubMed ID: 12362471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating inbreeding rate and effective population size in the Finnish Ayrshire population in the era of genomic selection.
Sarviaho K; Uimari P; Martikainen K
J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 May; 140(3):343-353. PubMed ID: 36808142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of kinship matrices on genetic gain and inbreeding with optimum contribution selection in a genomic dairy cattle breeding program.
Gautason E; Sahana G; Guldbrandtsen B; Berg P
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jul; 55(1):48. PubMed ID: 37460999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Novel strategies to minimize progeny inbreeding while maximizing genetic gain using genomic information.
Pryce JE; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):377-88. PubMed ID: 22192217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.
Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):9956-9970. PubMed ID: 31495630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimised parent selection and minimum inbreeding mating in small aquaculture breeding schemes: a simulation study.
Hely FS; Amer PR; Walker SP; Symonds JE
Animal; 2013 Jan; 7(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23031385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.
Seno LO; Guidolin DGF; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Nascimento GBD; Silva TBRD; Oliveira HN; Munari DP
J Dairy Res; 2018 May; 85(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29785919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of genomic selection on rate of inbreeding and coancestry and effective population size of Holstein and Jersey cattle populations.
Makanjuola BO; Miglior F; Abdalla EA; Maltecca C; Schenkel FS; Baes CF
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5183-5199. PubMed ID: 32278553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A low-marker density implementation of genomic selection in aquaculture using within-family genomic breeding values.
Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):39. PubMed ID: 24127852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of genomic selection on genetic diversity and genetic gain in three French dairy cattle breeds.
Doublet AC; Croiseau P; Fritz S; Michenet A; Hozé C; Danchin-Burge C; Laloë D; Restoux G
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Sep; 51(1):52. PubMed ID: 31547802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding.
Pedersen LD; Sørensen AC; Berg P
J Dairy Sci; 2009 May; 92(5):2214-23. PubMed ID: 19389980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of dairy cattle breeding designs that use genomic selection.
Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):493-500. PubMed ID: 21183061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
