These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24171977)

  • 1. Comparison of antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam in class two restorations by Streptococcus mutans count analysis at fixed intervals: an in vivo study.
    Tegginmani VS; Goel B; Uppin V; Horatti P; Kumar LS; Nainani A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 24171977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study of plaque mutans streptococci levels in children receiving glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Ertuğrul F; Eltem R; Eronat C
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 12762601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mutans streptococci in interproximal plaque from amalgam and glass ionomer restorations.
    Svanberg M; Krasse B; Ornerfeldt HO
    Caries Res; 1990; 24(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 2111222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An in vitro study on the secondary caries-prevention properties of three restorative materials.
    Lai GY; Zhu LK; Li MY; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):363-8. PubMed ID: 23998624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations.
    Svanberg M; Mjör IA; Orstavik D
    J Dent Res; 1990 Mar; 69(3):861-4. PubMed ID: 2109000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Class II glass ionomer/silver cermet restorations and their effect on interproximal growth of mutans streptococci.
    Berg JH; Farrell JE; Brown LR
    Pediatr Dent; 1990 Feb; 12(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 2119036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inhibition of artificial secondary caries in root by fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
    Torii Y; Itota T; Okamoto M; Nakabo S; Nagamine M; Inoue K
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 11203775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations.
    Donly KJ; Segura A; Kanellis M; Erickson RL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Oct; 130(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 10570589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations.
    Dionysopoulos P; Kotsanos N; Koliniotou-Koubia ; Papagodiannis Y
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 8700758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lateral-access Class II restoration using resin-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7568722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations.
    Paolantonio M; D'ercole S; Perinetti G; Tripodi D; Catamo G; Serra E; Bruè C; Piccolomini R
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fluoride release of glass ionomers.
    Forsten L
    J Esthet Dent; 1994; 6(5):216-22. PubMed ID: 8593218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lack of effect of fluoride releasing resin modified glass ionomer restorations on the contacting surface of adjacent primary molars. a clinical prospective study.
    Kotsanos N; Dionysopoulos P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Sep; 5(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 15471520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo cariostatic effect of resin modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam on dentine.
    Kreulen CM; de Soet JJ; Weerheijm KL; van Amerongen WE
    Caries Res; 1997; 31(5):384-9. PubMed ID: 9286523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fluoride and mutans streptococci in plaque grown on glass ionomer and composite.
    Forss H; Jokinen J; Spets-Happonen S; Seppä L; Luoma H
    Caries Res; 1991; 25(6):454-8. PubMed ID: 1810658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material on artificially demineralised dentine caries in vitro.
    Creanor SL; Awawdeh LA; Saunders WP; Foye RH; Gilmour WH
    J Dent; 1998; 26(5-6):527-31. PubMed ID: 9699447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Influence of topical fluoridation of glass ionomer cements on inhibitory activity on cariogenic bacteria].
    Płuciennik-Stronias M; Sakowska D; Krzemiński Z; Piatowska D
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2010; 62(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 21473102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In situ anticariogenic potential of glass ionomer cement.
    Benelli EM; Serra MC; Rodrigues AL; Cury JA
    Caries Res; 1993; 27(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 8402802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.