BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24171990)

  • 1. Microleakage of a self-adhesive class V composite on primary and permanent dentitions.
    Shafiei L; Mojiri P; Ghahraman Y; Rakhshan V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 24171990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.
    Güngör HC; Canoğlu E; Cehreli ZC
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 38(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 25095316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of composite and two types of glass ionomer restorations with saliva contamination at different steps.
    Farmer SN; Ludlow SW; Donaldson ME; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
    Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 24717701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of class V resin composites using various self-etching adhesives: an in vitro study.
    Chandra PV; Harikumar V; Ramkiran D; Krishna MJ; Gouda MV
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 23579893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
    Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.
    Krifka S; Federlin M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1117-24. PubMed ID: 21947906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of surface pretreatment on the microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement restorations.
    Bayrak S; Sen TE; Tuloglu N
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012; 36(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 22838231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW
    J Adhes Dent; 2005; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A; Plasschaert AJ; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 16924989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of different types of flowable restorative resins on microleakage of Class V cavities.
    Yazici AR; Ozgünaltay G; Dayangaç B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):773-8. PubMed ID: 14653293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adhesion of indirect MOD resin composite inlays luted with self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements.
    Inukai T; Abe T; Ito Y; Pilecki P; Wilson RF; Watson TF; Foxton RM
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):474-84. PubMed ID: 22360367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gingival microleakage of class V composite restorations with fiber inserts.
    Ahmed W; El-Badrawy W; Kulkarni G; Prakki A; El-Mowafy O
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):622-8. PubMed ID: 24309339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of salivary contamination on microleakage of resin composites placed with a self-etch adhesive in primary teeth: an in vitro study.
    Fakhri M; Seraj B; Shahrabi M; Motahhary P; Hooshmand T
    Pediatr Dent; 2009; 31(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 19722444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.