376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24172026)
1. Effect of robotic surgery on hysterectomy trends: implications for resident education.
Yamasato K; Casey D; Kaneshiro B; Hiraoka M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 24172026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in reported resident surgical experience in hysterectomy.
Washburn EE; Cohen SL; Manoucheri E; Zurawin RK; Einarsson JI
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1067-70. PubMed ID: 24907549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of robotic surgery on obstetric-gynecologic resident training.
Brenot K; Goyert GL
J Reprod Med; 2009; 54(11-12):675-7. PubMed ID: 20120900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of robotic technology on hysterectomy route and associated implications for resident education.
Jeppson PC; Rahimi S; Gattoc L; Westermann LB; Cichowski S; Raker C; LeBrun EEW; Sung VW;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):196.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25068556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Impact of Robotic-Assisted Surgery on Training Gynecology Residents.
Moola D; Westermann LB; Pauls R; Eschenbacher M; Crisp C
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 26680564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of a robotic surgical system on hysterectomy trends.
Wasson MN; Hoffman MK
Del Med J; 2015 Feb; 87(2):45-50. PubMed ID: 25876290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variability in gynecologic case volume of obstetrician-gynecologist residents graduating from 2009 to 2017.
Hall EF; Raker CA; Hampton BS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 222(6):617.e1-617.e8. PubMed ID: 31765644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital. Decreasing the need for abdominal hysterectomy and increasing resident experience in vaginal surgery.
Fylstra DL; Carter JF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 8829062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hysterectomy Route and Numbers Reported by Graduating Residents in Obstetrics and Gynecology Training Programs.
Gressel GM; Potts JR; Cha S; Valea FA; Banks E
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 135(2):268-273. PubMed ID: 31923067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The fellowship effect: how the establishment of a fellowship in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery affected resident vaginal hysterectomy training.
Danford JM; White NC; New M; Fletcher S; Blume JD; Ward RM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 211(5):559.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25025941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
Lim PC; Crane JT; English EJ; Farnam RW; Garza DM; Winter ML; Rozeboom JL
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 133(3):359-64. PubMed ID: 26952352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.
Wright JD; Ananth CV; Lewin SN; Burke WM; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Herzog TJ; Hershman DL
JAMA; 2013 Feb; 309(7):689-98. PubMed ID: 23423414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inpatient Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in the United States: Trends and Factors Associated With Approach Selection.
Desai VB; Guo XM; Fan L; Wright JD; Xu X
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):151-158.e1. PubMed ID: 27614151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches.
Martino MA; Berger EA; McFetridge JT; Shubella J; Gosciniak G; Wejkszner T; Kainz GF; Patriarco J; Thomas MB; Boulay R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):389-93. PubMed ID: 24513969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decrease in the number of abdominal hysterectomies after introduction of laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Robertson EA; de Blok S
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2000 Nov; 7(4):523-5. PubMed ID: 11044505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Canadian hysterectomy educational experience: survey of recent graduates in obstetrics and gynecology.
Kroft J; Moody JR; Lee P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 21570363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies.
Hur HC; Guido RS; Mansuria SM; Hacker MR; Sanfilippo JS; Lee TT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 17478361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The increasing use of robot-assisted approach for hysterectomy results in decreasing rates of abdominal hysterectomy and traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Smorgick N; Patzkowsky KE; Hoffman MR; Advincula AP; Song AH; As-Sanie S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Jan; 289(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 23839534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Favorability Score for Vaginal Hysterectomy in a Statewide Collaborative.
Skinner BD; Kamdar NS; Mahnert N; Lim CS; Mullard AJ; Campbell DA; As-Sanie S; Morgan DM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1146-1151. PubMed ID: 27565997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
