BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24172584)

  • 1. Digital breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction using 2D and 3D total variation minimization.
    Ertas M; Yildirim I; Kamasak M; Akan A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2013 Oct; 12():112. PubMed ID: 24172584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An object-oriented simulator for 3D digital breast tomosynthesis imaging system.
    Seyyedi S; Cengiz K; Kamasak M; Yildirim I
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2013; 2013():250689. PubMed ID: 24371468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An iterative reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis imaging using real data at three radiation doses.
    Polat A; Yildirim I
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 29504549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 3D digital breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction using anisotropic total variation minimization.
    Seyyedi S; Yildirim I
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():6052-5. PubMed ID: 25571377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Total variation minimization filter for DBT imaging.
    Mota AM; Matela N; Oliveira N; Almeida P
    Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2827-36. PubMed ID: 26127035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An iterative tomosynthesis reconstruction using total variation combined with non-local means filtering.
    Ertas M; Yildirim I; Kamasak M; Akan A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2014 May; 13():65. PubMed ID: 24886602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of total variation minimization in volume rendering visualization of breast tomosynthesis data.
    Mota AM; Clarkson MJ; Almeida P; Peralta L; Matela N
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105534. PubMed ID: 32480190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of reconstruction algorithms for a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.
    Hu Z; Chen Z; Zhou C; Hong X; Chen J; Zhang Q; Jiang C; Ge Y; Yang Y; Liu X; Zheng H; Li Z; Liang D
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(6):1157-1169. PubMed ID: 32925159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel approach to digital breast tomosynthesis for simultaneous acquisition of 2D and 3D images.
    Vecchio S; Albanese A; Vignoli P; Taibi A
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Jun; 21(6):1207-13. PubMed ID: 21193910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective-diffusion regularization for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
    Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6003-14. PubMed ID: 21158312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Segmented separable footprint projector for digital breast tomosynthesis and its application for subpixel reconstruction.
    Zheng J; Fessler JA; Chan HP
    Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28058719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of back projection methods for breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction.
    Zhou W; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
    J Digit Imaging; 2015 Jun; 28(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25384538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved digital breast tomosynthesis images using automated ultrasound.
    Zhang X; Yuan J; Du S; Kripfgans OD; Wang X; Carson PL; Liu X
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061911. PubMed ID: 24877822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive-weighted high order TV algorithm for sparse-view CT reconstruction.
    Xi Y; Zhou P; Yu H; Zhang T; Zhang L; Qiao Z; Liu F
    Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5568-5584. PubMed ID: 36934310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a chest digital tomosynthesis R/F system and implementation of low-dose GPU-accelerated compressed sensing (CS) image reconstruction.
    Choi S; Lee H; Lee D; Choi S; Lee CL; Kwon W; Shin J; Seo CW; Kim HJ
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1871-1888. PubMed ID: 29500855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating simulation-based metrics for characterizing linear iterative reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Rose SD; Sanchez AA; Sidky EY; Pan X
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):e279-e296. PubMed ID: 28901614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An adaptive multiscale anisotropic diffusion regularized image reconstruction method for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Liu Y; Zhang C; Li W; Tang Y; Gao X
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Dec; 41(4):993-1008. PubMed ID: 30374771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduced anatomical clutter in digital breast tomosynthesis with statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Garrett JW; Li Y; Li K; Chen GH
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2009-2022. PubMed ID: 29542821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
    Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.