148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24173813)
1. How crucial is the response format for the testing effect?
Jönsson FU; Kubik V; Sundqvist ML; Todorov I; Jonsson B
Psychol Res; 2014 Sep; 78(5):623-33. PubMed ID: 24173813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Covert retrieval practice benefits retention as much as overt retrieval practice.
Smith MA; Roediger HL; Karpicke JD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1712-25. PubMed ID: 23815513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benefits of testing for nontested information: retrieval-induced facilitation of episodically bound material.
Rowland CA; DeLosh EL
Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1516-23. PubMed ID: 24671778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Putting action into testing: Enacted retrieval benefits long-term retention more than covert retrieval.
Kubik V; Jönsson FU; de Jonge M; Arshamian A
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Dec; 73(12):2093-2105. PubMed ID: 32686985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing Boundary Conditions of the Testing Effect: On the Relative Efficacy of Covert vs. Overt Retrieval.
Sundqvist ML; Mäntylä T; Jönsson FU
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1018. PubMed ID: 28680411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repeated testing, item selection, and relearning: the benefits of testing outweigh the costs.
de Jonge M; Tabbers HK
Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 23422656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals.
Rowland CA; DeLosh EL
Memory; 2015; 23(3):403-19. PubMed ID: 24579674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The testing effect in a social setting: Does retrieval practice benefit a listener?
Abel M; Roediger HL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Sep; 24(3):347-359. PubMed ID: 29172560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrieval practice and spacing effects in young and older adults: An examination of the benefits of desirable difficulty.
Maddox GB; Balota DA
Mem Cognit; 2015 Jul; 43(5):760-74. PubMed ID: 25616776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tests enhance retention and transfer of spatial learning.
Carpenter SK; Kelly JW
Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 22318460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of memory reactivation during wakefulness and sleep in determining which memories endure.
Oudiette D; Antony JW; Creery JD; Paller KA
J Neurosci; 2013 Apr; 33(15):6672-8. PubMed ID: 23575863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Divided attention: an undesirable difficulty in memory retention.
Gaspelin N; Ruthruff E; Pashler H
Mem Cognit; 2013 Oct; 41(7):978-88. PubMed ID: 23690275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A role for familiarity in supporting the testing effect over time.
Shaffer RA; McDermott KB
Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107298. PubMed ID: 31838098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contracting, equal, and expanding learning schedules: the optimal distribution of learning sessions depends on retention interval.
Küpper-Tetzel CE; Kapler IV; Wiseheart M
Mem Cognit; 2014 Jul; 42(5):729-41. PubMed ID: 24500777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials?
Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
Mem Cognit; 2010 Jan; 38(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 19966244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Study for now, but judge for later: delayed judgments of learning promote long-term retention.
Sundqvist ML; Todorov I; Kubik V; Jönsson FU
Scand J Psychol; 2012 Dec; 53(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 22897518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Decomposing the interaction between retention interval and study/test practice: the role of retrievability.
Jang Y; Wixted JT; Pecher D; Zeelenberg R; Huber DE
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(5):962-75. PubMed ID: 22304454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Between-list lag effects in recall depend on retention interval.
Pyc MA; Balota DA; McDermott KB; Tully T; Roediger HL
Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):965-77. PubMed ID: 24643791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of delayed judgments of learning on retention.
Tekin E; Roediger HL
Metacogn Learn; 2021; 16(2):407-429. PubMed ID: 33679269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
