These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24174112)

  • 1. Familiarity adds to attractiveness in matters of siskin mate choice.
    Senar JC; Mateos-Gonzalez F; Uribe F; Arroyo L
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Dec; 280(1773):20132361. PubMed ID: 24174112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexual and non-sexual social preferences in male and female white-eyed bulbuls.
    Kabasakal B; Poláček M; Aslan A; Hoi H; Erdoğan A; Griggio M
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):5847. PubMed ID: 28724892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. You can't always get what you want: size assortative mating by mutual mate choice as a resolution of sexual conflict.
    Baldauf SA; Kullmann H; Schroth SH; Thünken T; Bakker TC
    BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Jun; 9():129. PubMed ID: 19515244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Corticosterone mediated mate choice affects female mating reluctance and reproductive success.
    Romero-Diaz C; Gonzalez-Jimena V; Fitze PS
    Horm Behav; 2019 Jul; 113():1-12. PubMed ID: 31034792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex-specific responses to sexual familiarity, and the role of olfaction in Drosophila.
    Tan CK; Løvlie H; Greenway E; Goodwin SF; Pizzari T; Wigby S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Nov; 280(1771):20131691. PubMed ID: 24068355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mate sampling influences the intensity of sexual selection and the evolution of costly sexual ornaments.
    Muniz DG; Machado G
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Jun; 447():74-83. PubMed ID: 29567325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How do familiarity and relatedness influence mate choice in Armadillidium vulgare?
    Fortin M; Vitet C; Souty-Grosset C; Richard FJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209893. PubMed ID: 30596784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of familiarity and group size on mating preferences in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata.
    Mariette MM; Zajitschek SR; Garcia CM; Brooks RC
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 23(8):1772-82. PubMed ID: 20626544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexually dimorphic role of oxytocin in medaka mate choice.
    Yokoi S; Naruse K; Kamei Y; Ansai S; Kinoshita M; Mito M; Iwasaki S; Inoue S; Okuyama T; Nakagawa S; Young LJ; Takeuchi H
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Mar; 117(9):4802-4808. PubMed ID: 32071244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Female mating preferences and offspring survival: testing hypotheses on the genetic basis of mate choice in a wild lekking bird.
    Sardell RJ; Kempenaers B; Duval EH
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Feb; 23(4):933-46. PubMed ID: 24383885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The importance of novelty: male-female interactions among blue-black grassquits in captivity.
    Dias RI; Oliveira RF; Podos J; Macedo RH
    Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():211-7. PubMed ID: 24406508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term persistence of exaggerated ornaments under Fisherian runaway despite costly mate search.
    Waffender A; Henshaw JM
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 36514848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does brain size affect mate choice? An experimental examination in pygmy halfbeaks.
    McNeil RM; Devigili A; Kolm N; Fitzpatrick JL
    Behav Ecol; 2021; 32(6):1103-1113. PubMed ID: 34949959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct fitness benefits explain mate preference, but not choice, for similarity in heterozygosity levels.
    Zandberg L; Gort G; van Oers K; Hinde CA
    Ecol Lett; 2017 Oct; 20(10):1306-1314. PubMed ID: 28868784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biased learning affects mate choice in a butterfly.
    Westerman EL; Hodgins-Davis A; Dinwiddie A; Monteiro A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Jul; 109(27):10948-53. PubMed ID: 22689980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mate Preferences and Choosiness Are Distinct Components of Mate Choice in Eastern Gray Treefrogs (
    Feagles O; Höbel G
    Am Nat; 2022 Oct; 200(4):506-517. PubMed ID: 36150198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trial marriage model-Female mate choice under male interference.
    Li MY; Geng ZS; Liao P; Wang XY; Yang TC; Wang JY; Wang DD; Gao LF; Du B
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Aug; 89(8):1851-1859. PubMed ID: 32329064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the architecture of mate choice decisions: preference functions and choosiness are distinct traits.
    Neelon DP; Rodríguez RL; Höbel G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Feb; 286(1897):20182830. PubMed ID: 30963823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mate choice based on a key ecological performance trait.
    Snowberg LK; Benkman CW
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Apr; 22(4):762-9. PubMed ID: 19320795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
    Jennions MD; Petrie M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.