216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24175841)
1. Should cut-off values of the risk of malignancy index be changed for evaluation of adnexal masses in Asian and Pacific populations?
Yavuzcan A; Caglar M; Ozgu E; Ustun Y; Dilbaz S; Ozdemir I; Yildiz E; Gungor T; Kumru S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(9):5455-9. PubMed ID: 24175841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the risk malignancy index diagnostic value in patients with adnexal masses.
Terzić M; Dotlić J; Ladjević IL; Atanacković J; Ladjević N
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2011 Jul; 68(7):589-93. PubMed ID: 21899180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The risk of malignancy index in discrimination of adnexal masses.
Ulusoy S; Akbayir O; Numanoglu C; Ulusoy N; Odabas E; Gulkilik A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2007 Mar; 96(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 17280665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A preliminary study: The sequential use of the risk malignancy index and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Qiu L; Yang F; Luo H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jul; 97(29):e11536. PubMed ID: 30024542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of the risk of malignancy index scoring systems (1-4) used in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Ozbay PO; Ekinci T; Caltekin MD; Yilmaz HT; Temur M; Yilmaz O; Uysal S; Demirel E; Kelekci S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(1):345-9. PubMed ID: 25640377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Application values of four risk of malignancy indices in the preoperative evaluation of patients with adnexal masses].
Lou HY; Meng H; Zhu QL; Zhang Q; Jiang YX
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2010 Jun; 32(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 20602883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of malignancy index in the evaluation of patients with adnexal masses.
Clarke SE; Grimshaw R; Rittenberg P; Kieser K; Bentley J
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 May; 31(5):440-5. PubMed ID: 19604425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive Value of Malignancy Risk Indices for Ovarian Masses in Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women.
Ertas S; Vural F; Vural F; Tufekci EC; Ertas AC; Kose G; Aka N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(4):2177-83. PubMed ID: 27221915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk of malignancy index in preoperative evaluation of pelvic masses.
Ashrafgangooei T; Rezaeezadeh M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(7):1727-30. PubMed ID: 22126553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differential diagnosis of adnexal masses: sequential use of the risk of malignancy index and HistoScanning, a novel computer-aided diagnostic tool.
Vaes E; Manchanda R; Autier P; Nir R; Nir D; Bleiberg H; Robert A; Menon U
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jan; 39(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 21695741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. External validation of the adapted Risk of Malignancy Index incorporating tumor size in the preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses.
van den Akker PA; Zusterzeel PL; Aalders AL; Snijders MP; Samlal RA; Vollebergh JH; Kluivers KB; Massuger LF
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Dec; 159(2):422-5. PubMed ID: 21824712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Presurgical diagnosis of adnexal tumours using mathematical models and scoring systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kaijser J; Sayasneh A; Van Hoorde K; Ghaem-Maghami S; Bourne T; Timmerman D; Van Calster B
Hum Reprod Update; 2014; 20(3):449-62. PubMed ID: 24327552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of risk of malignancy index (RMI), CA125, CA 19-9, ultrasound score, and menopausal status in borderline ovarian tumor.
Alanbay I; Akturk E; Coksuer H; Ercan M; Karaşahin E; Dede M; Yenen MC; Ozan H; Baser I
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2012 Jun; 28(6):478-82. PubMed ID: 22122561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk of malignancy index in the preoperative evaluation of patients with adnexal masses.
Andersen ES; Knudsen A; Rix P; Johansen B
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Jul; 90(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 12821350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective study to evaluate the risk malignancy index and its diagnostic implication in patients with suspected ovarian mass.
Dora SK; Dandapat AB; Pande B; Hota JP
J Ovarian Res; 2017 Aug; 10(1):55. PubMed ID: 28806987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.
Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):456-65. PubMed ID: 21520475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Addition of parity to the risk of malignancy index score in evaluating adnexal masses.
Yavuzcan A; Çağlar M; Özgü E; Üstün Y; Dilbaz S; Ozdemir I; Güngör T; Kumru S
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 53(4):518-22. PubMed ID: 25510694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of a risk of malignancy index in clinical approaches to adnexal masses.
Simsek HS; Tokmak A; Ozgu E; Doganay M; Danisman N; Erkaya S; Gungor T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(18):7793-7. PubMed ID: 25292065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The accuracy of risk malignancy index in prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal mass in Basrah, Iraq.
Al-Asadi JN; Al-Maliki SK; Al-Dahhhan F; Al-Naama L; Suood F
Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1254-1259. PubMed ID: 30297555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
