355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24176152)
1. Should a first trimester dating scan be routine for all pregnancies?
Doubilet PM
Semin Perinatol; 2013 Oct; 37(5):307-9. PubMed ID: 24176152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dating and growth in the first trimester.
Bottomley C; Bourne T
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Aug; 23(4):439-52. PubMed ID: 19282247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal gender screening by ultrasound at 11 to 13(+6) weeks.
Hsiao CH; Wang HC; Hsieh CF; Hsu JJ
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 17851807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies.
Sladkevicius P; Saltvedt S; Almström H; Kublickas M; Grunewald C; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16149101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fetal crown-rump length and estimation of gestational age in an ethnic Chinese population.
Sahota DS; Leung TY; Leung TN; Chan OK; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 19115262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. First-trimester screening in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: significance of gestational dating by oocyte retrieval or sonographic measurement of crown-rump length.
Gjerris AC; Loft A; Pinborg A; Tabor A; Christiansen M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 32(5):612-7. PubMed ID: 18816495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative analysis of second-trimester ultrasound dating formulae in pregnancies conceived with artificial reproductive techniques.
Mul T; Mongelli M; Gardosi J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Dec; 8(6):397-402. PubMed ID: 9014279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. First-trimester ultrasound dating of twin pregnancy: are singleton charts reliable?
Dias T; Mahsud-Dornan S; Thilaganathan B; Papageorghiou A; Bhide A
BJOG; 2010 Jul; 117(8):979-84. PubMed ID: 20482534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Should second trimester ultrasound be routine for all pregnancies?
Makhlouf M; Saade G
Semin Perinatol; 2013 Oct; 37(5):323-6. PubMed ID: 24176154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does a first trimester dating scan using crown rump length measurement reduce the rate of induction of labour for prolonged pregnancy? An uncompleted randomised controlled trial of 463 women.
Harrington DJ; MacKenzie IZ; Thompson K; Fleminger M; Greenwood C
BJOG; 2006 Feb; 113(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 16411994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Construction of modern Australian first trimester ultrasound dating and growth charts.
McLennan AC; Schluter PJ
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Oct; 52(5):471-9. PubMed ID: 19032393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Dating biometry with crown-rump length, precision of a routine practice].
Grange G; Pannier E; Goffinet F; Zorn JR; Cabrol D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2003; 32(3 Pt 1):221-6. PubMed ID: 12773924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. First- and second-trimester ultrasound assessment of gestational age.
Kalish RB; Thaler HT; Chasen ST; Gupta M; Berman SJ; Rosenwaks Z; Chervenak FA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):975-8. PubMed ID: 15467575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Which ultrasound or biochemical markers are independent predictors of small-for-gestational age?
Law LW; Leung TY; Sahota DS; Chan LW; Fung TY; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 34(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 19670336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical implications of machine-probe combinations on obstetric ultrasound measurements used in pregnancy dating.
Axell R; Lynch C; Chudleigh T; Bradshaw L; Mangat J; White P; Lees C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 40(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 22190416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal volume measurements with three dimensional ultrasound in the first trimester of pregnancy, related to pregnancy outcome, a prospective cohort study.
Smeets NA; Prudon M; Winkens B; Oei SG
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2012 May; 12():38. PubMed ID: 22640017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A proposed protocol for obstetrical ultrasound examination].
Novakov A; Vejnović T; Stojić S; Belopavlović Z
Med Pregl; 1999; 52(9-10):351-6. PubMed ID: 10624383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. First-trimester growth and the risk of low birth weight.
Smith GC; Smith MF; McNay MB; Fleming JE
N Engl J Med; 1998 Dec; 339(25):1817-22. PubMed ID: 9854117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. First trimester dating by fetal heart rate assessment: a comparison with crown-rump length measurement.
Obican SG; Khodak-Gelman S; Elmi A; Larsen JW; Friedman AM
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jan; 28(1):68-70. PubMed ID: 24635416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study.
Verburg BO; Steegers EA; De Ridder M; Snijders RJ; Smith E; Hofman A; Moll HA; Jaddoe VW; Witteman JC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Apr; 31(4):388-96. PubMed ID: 18348183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
