These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

501 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24176288)

  • 1. Development of archetypes for non-ranking classification and comparison of European National Health Technology Assessment systems.
    Allen N; Pichler F; Wang T; Patel S; Salek S
    Health Policy; 2013 Dec; 113(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 24176288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comparison of Reimbursement Recommendations by European HTA Agencies: Is There Opportunity for Further Alignment?
    Allen N; Liberti L; Walker SR; Salek S
    Front Pharmacol; 2017; 8():384. PubMed ID: 28713265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
    Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of health technology assessment on pharmaceutical reimbursement in selected middle-income countries.
    Oortwijn W; Mathijssen J; Banta D
    Health Policy; 2010 May; 95(2-3):174-84. PubMed ID: 20074829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of health technology assessment in coverage decisions on newborn screening.
    Fischer KE; Grosse SD; Rogowski WH
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2011 Oct; 27(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 22004771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health technology assessment.
    Papatheofanis FJ
    Q J Nucl Med; 2000 Jun; 44(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 10967621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practical tools and methods for health technology assessment in Europe: structures, methodologies, and tools developed by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment, EUnetHTA.
    Kristensen FB; Lampe K; Chase DL; Lee-Robin SH; Wild C; Moharra M; Garrido MV; Nielsen CP; Røttingen JA; Neikter SA; Bistrup ML;
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Dec; 25 Suppl 2():1-8. PubMed ID: 20030885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diffusion and use of health technology assessment in policy making: what lessons for decentralised healthcare systems?
    Ciani O; Tarricone R; Torbica A
    Health Policy; 2012 Dec; 108(2-3):194-202. PubMed ID: 23093020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Policies for Use of Real-World Data in Health Technology Assessment (HTA): A Comparative Study of Six HTA Agencies.
    Makady A; Ham RT; de Boer A; Hillege H; Klungel O; Goettsch W;
    Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):520-532. PubMed ID: 28407993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A history of health technology assessment at the European level.
    Banta D; Kristensen FB; Jonsson E
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():68-73. PubMed ID: 19534837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health technology assessment: research trends and future priorities in Europe.
    Nielsen CP; Funch TM; Kristensen FB
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2011 Jul; 16 Suppl 2():6-15. PubMed ID: 21737525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions.
    Drummond MF; Schwartz JS; Jönsson B; Luce BR; Neumann PJ; Siebert U; Sullivan SD
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(3):244-58; discussion 362-8. PubMed ID: 18601792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of HTA research on policy decision-making.
    Youngkong S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 May; 97 Suppl 5():S119-26. PubMed ID: 24964709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. INTRODUCTION OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT FOR MEDICINES IN SLOVAKIA.
    Tesar T; Hloska A; Wawruch M; Lehocka L; Snopkova M; Masarykova L
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(3):345-349. PubMed ID: 28434416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Harmonization of evidence requirements for health technology assessment in reimbursement decision making.
    Hutton J; Trueman P; Facey K
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):511-7. PubMed ID: 18828948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developing Health Technology Assessment to address health care system needs.
    Velasco Garrido M; Gerhardus A; Røttingen JA; Busse R
    Health Policy; 2010 Mar; 94(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 19889471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in Health Technology Assessment Recommendations Among European Jurisdictions: The Role of Practice Variations.
    Vreman RA; Mantel-Teeuwisse AK; Hövels AM; Leufkens HGM; Goettsch WG
    Value Health; 2020 Jan; 23(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 31952664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Quality of health care, accreditation, and health technology assessment in Croatia: role of agency for quality and accreditation in health].
    Mittermayer R; Huić M; Mestrović J
    Acta Med Croatica; 2010 Dec; 64(5):425-34. PubMed ID: 21692267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) recommendations for drug therapies issued between 2007 and 2009 and their impact on policymaking processes in Poland.
    Kolasa K; Schubert S; Manca A; Hermanowski T
    Health Policy; 2011 Oct; 102(2-3):145-51. PubMed ID: 21641074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.