These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24178119)

  • 1. Effective sizes of livestock populations to prevent a decline in fitness.
    Meuwissen TH; Woolliams JA
    Theor Appl Genet; 1994 Dec; 89(7-8):1019-26. PubMed ID: 24178119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of population size and selection intensity on correlated responses to selection for postweaning gain in mice.
    Eisen EJ; Hanrahan JP; Legates JE
    Genetics; 1973 May; 74(1):157-70. PubMed ID: 4711902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding and predicting the fitness decline of shrunk populations: inbreeding, purging, mutation, and standard selection.
    García-Dorado A
    Genetics; 2012 Apr; 190(4):1461-76. PubMed ID: 22298709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of population size and isolation on heterosis, mean fitness, and inbreeding depression in a perennial plant.
    Oakley CG; Winn AA
    New Phytol; 2012 Oct; 196(1):261-270. PubMed ID: 22816555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simple method to account for natural selection when predicting inbreeding depression.
    García-Dorado A
    Genetics; 2008 Nov; 180(3):1559-66. PubMed ID: 18791247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reversed selection responses in small populations of the housefly (Musca domestica L.).
    Meffert LM; Regan JL
    Genetica; 2006 May; 127(1-3):1-9. PubMed ID: 16850208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The variance in inbreeding depression and the recovery of fitness in bottlenecked populations.
    Fowler K; Whitlock MC
    Proc Biol Sci; 1999 Oct; 266(1433):2061-6. PubMed ID: 10902542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mathematical modelling for variations of inbreeding populations fitness with single and polygenic traits.
    Sun S; Klebaner F; Tian T
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 2):196. PubMed ID: 28361703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trends in genetic diversity and the effect of inbreeding in American Angus cattle under genomic selection.
    Lozada-Soto EA; Maltecca C; Lu D; Miller S; Cole JB; Tiezzi F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Jun; 53(1):50. PubMed ID: 34134619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response to selection while maximizing genetic variance in small populations.
    Cervantes I; Gutiérrez JP; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Sep; 48(1):69. PubMed ID: 27649906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EFFECTIVENESS OF SELECTION IN REDUCING THE GENETIC LOAD IN POPULATIONS OF PEROMYSCUS POLIONOTUS DURING GENERATIONS OF INBREEDING.
    Lacy RC; Ballou JD
    Evolution; 1998 Jun; 52(3):900-909. PubMed ID: 28565244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of genetic purging under competitive conditions.
    López-Cortegano E; Vilas A; Caballero A; García-Dorado A
    Evolution; 2016 Aug; 70(8):1856-70. PubMed ID: 27302839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. INBREEDING: ITS EFFECT ON RESPONSE TO SELECTION FOR PUPAL WEIGHT AND THE HERITABLE VARIANCE IN FITNESS IN THE FLOUR BEETLE, TRIBOLIUM CASTANEUM.
    Wade MJ; Shuster SM; Stevens L
    Evolution; 1996 Apr; 50(2):723-733. PubMed ID: 28568953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of inbreeding rate on fitness, inbreeding depression and heterosis over a range of inbreeding coefficients.
    Pekkala N; Knott KE; Kotiaho JS; Nissinen K; Puurtinen M
    Evol Appl; 2014 Nov; 7(9):1107-19. PubMed ID: 25553071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reduced genetic load revealed by slow inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Latter BD; Mulley JC; Reid D; Pascoe L
    Genetics; 1995 Jan; 139(1):287-97. PubMed ID: 7705630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: mutation parameters and inbreeding rate.
    Wang J; Hill WG; Charlesworth D; Charlesworth B
    Genet Res; 1999 Oct; 74(2):165-78. PubMed ID: 10584559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The inbreeding depression cost of selfing: Importance of flower size and population size in Collinsia parviflora (Veronicaceae).
    Kennedy BF; Elle E
    Am J Bot; 2008 Dec; 95(12):1596-605. PubMed ID: 21628166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Designing artificial selection experiments for specific objectives.
    Bohren BB
    Genetics; 1975 May; 80(1):205-20. PubMed ID: 17248682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing alternative methods for purging genetic load using the housefly (Musca domestica L.).
    Meffert LM; Regan JL; Hicks SK; Mukana N; Day SB
    Genetica; 2006; 128(1-3):419-27. PubMed ID: 17028969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mutation-selection balance accounting for genetic variation for viability in Drosophila melanogaster as deduced from an inbreeding and artificial selection experiment.
    Rodríguez-Ramilo ST; Pérez-Figueroa A; Fernández B; Fernández J; Caballero A
    J Evol Biol; 2004 May; 17(3):528-41. PubMed ID: 15149396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.