These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24178186)

  • 1. How allele frequency and study design affect association test statistics with misrepresentation errors.
    Escott-Price V; Ghodsi M; Schmidt KM
    Biostatistics; 2014 Apr; 15(2):311-26. PubMed ID: 24178186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increase of rejection rate in case-control studies with the differential genotyping error rates.
    Ahn K; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2009; 8():Article25. PubMed ID: 19492983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Susceptibility of biallelic haplotype and genotype frequencies to genotyping error.
    Moskvina V; Schmidt KM
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1116-23. PubMed ID: 17156286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantifying the percent increase in minimum sample size for SNP genotyping errors in genetic model-based association studies.
    Kang SJ; Finch SJ; Haynes C; Gordon D
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):139-44. PubMed ID: 15812170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies?
    Kang SJ; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):132-41. PubMed ID: 14748013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of SNP genotyping errors on the power of the Cochran-Armitage linear trend test for case/control association studies.
    Ahn K; Haynes C; Kim W; Fleur RS; Gordon D; Finch SJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Mar; 71(Pt 2):249-61. PubMed ID: 17096677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correcting for differential genotyping error in genetic association analysis.
    Yuan M; Fang H; Zhang H
    J Hum Genet; 2013 Oct; 58(10):657-66. PubMed ID: 23863749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing for association with a case-parents design in the presence of genotyping errors.
    Morris RW; Kaplan NL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 14748014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporating individual error rate into association test of unmatched case-control design.
    Hao K; Wang X
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):154-63. PubMed ID: 15812172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact and quantification of the sources of error in DNA pooling designs.
    Jawaid A; Sham P
    Ann Hum Genet; 2009 Jan; 73(1):118-24. PubMed ID: 18945289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeated measurement sampling in genetic association analysis with genotyping errors.
    Lai R; Zhang H; Yang Y
    Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 31(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 17187401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the impact of differential genotyping errors on rare variant tests of association.
    Mayer-Jochimsen M; Fast S; Tintle NL
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e56626. PubMed ID: 23472072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identification of probable genotyping errors by consideration of haplotypes.
    Becker T; Valentonyte R; Croucher PJ; Strauch K; Schreiber S; Hampe J; Knapp M
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2006 Apr; 14(4):450-8. PubMed ID: 16435001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the presence of disease association.
    Li M; Li C
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 32(7):589-99. PubMed ID: 18449919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combined linkage and association mapping of quantitative trait Loci with missing completely at random genotype data.
    Fan R; Liu L; Jung J; Zhong M
    Behav Genet; 2008 May; 38(3):316-36. PubMed ID: 18306033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detecting genotyping error using measures of degree of Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium.
    Attia J; Thakkinstian A; McElduff P; Milne E; Dawson S; Scott RJ; Klerk Nd; Armstrong B; Thompson J
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article 5. PubMed ID: 20196755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cost-effective statistical method to correct for differential genotype misclassification when performing case-control genetic association.
    Londono D; Haynes C; De La Vega FM; Finch SJ; Gordon D
    Hum Hered; 2010; 70(2):102-8. PubMed ID: 20606457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using overall allele-sharing to detect the presence of large-scale data errors and parameter misspecification in sib-pair linkage studies.
    Olson JM; Song Y; Lu Q; Wedig GC; Goddard KA
    Hum Hered; 2004; 58(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 15604564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A simple and robust TDT-type test against genotyping error with error rates varying across families.
    Cheng KF; Chen JH
    Hum Hered; 2007; 64(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17476111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The detection of gene-environment interaction for continuous traits: should we deal with measurement error by bigger studies or better measurement?
    Wong MY; Day NE; Luan JA; Chan KP; Wareham NJ
    Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 32(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 12690008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.