These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24179969)

  • 1. Shock absorption capacity of restorative materials for dental implant prostheses: an in vitro study.
    Menini M; Conserva E; Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Pera F; Signori A; Pera P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 24179969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of a masticatory robot to analyze the shock absorption capacity of different restorative materials for prosthetic implants: a preliminary report.
    Conserva E; Menini M; Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Ravera G; Pera F; Pera P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 19260428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of superstructure materials on strain around an implant under 2 loading conditions: a technical investigation.
    Stegaroiu R; Khraisat A; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):735-42. PubMed ID: 15508991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
    Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic chewing simulator for dental materials testing on a sensor-equipped implant setup.
    Conserva E; Menini M; Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Pera F; Ravera G; Pera P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):501-8. PubMed ID: 19149066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stress dissipation in the bone through various crown materials of dental implant restoration: a 2-D finite element analysis.
    Bijjargi S; Chowdhary R
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Aug; 4(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 23172842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrievable metal ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with milled titanium frameworks and all-ceramic crowns: retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up.
    Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Borges J; Almeida R
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 22339902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro study of the effect of different restorative materials on the reliability of a veneering porcelain.
    Anderson MR; Chung KH; Flinn BD; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Dec; 110(6):521-8. PubMed ID: 24189113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the effect of retightening and mechanical cycling on preload maintenance of retention screws.
    Delben JA; Gomes EA; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 21483877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
    Vult von Steyern P
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with CAD/CAM-fabricated porcelain crown and zirconia-based framework.
    Takaba M; Tanaka S; Ishiura Y; Baba K
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):402-7. PubMed ID: 23289495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Damping behavior of implant-supported restorations.
    Magne P; Silva M; Oderich E; Boff LL; Enciso R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Feb; 24(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 22092518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
    Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of abutment type and esthetic veneering on preload maintenance of abutment screw of implant-supported crowns.
    Delben JA; Barão VA; Dos Santos PH; Assunção WG
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 23725369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stress analysis of metal-free polymer crowns using the three-dimensional finite element method.
    Nakamura T; Imanishi A; Kashima H; Ohyama T; Ishigaki S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 12066632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of different core material on the FEA-determined stress distribution in dental crowns.
    De Jager N; de Kler M; van der Zel JM
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 16099031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fatigue resistance of 2 different CAD/CAM glass-ceramic materials used for single-tooth implant crowns.
    Çavuşoğlu Y; Sahin E; Gürbüz R; Akça K
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 21881517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical performance of implant-supported posterior crowns.
    de Kok P; Kleverlaan CJ; de Jager N; Kuijs R; Feilzer AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 25819357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.