105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24179974)
1. A method to improve passive fit of frameworks on implant-supported prostheses: an in vivo study.
Manzella C; Burello V; Bignardi C; Carossa S; Schierano G
Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(6):577-9. PubMed ID: 24179974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of verification jig on framework fit for nonsegmented fixed implant-supported complete denture.
Ercoli C; Geminiani A; Feng C; Lee H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e188-95. PubMed ID: 22176765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A method for fabrication of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Zafiropoulos GG; Hoffmann O; Deli G
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Jun; 40(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 24914913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of fit of CNC-milled titanium and zirconia frameworks to implants.
Abduo J; Lyons K; Waddell N; Bennani V; Swain M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e20-9. PubMed ID: 21414138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of different restorative and abutment materials on marginal and internal adaptation of three-unit cantilever implant-supported fixed partial dentures: an in vitro study.
Kahramanoğlu E; Kulak-Özkan Y
J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec; 22(8):608-17. PubMed ID: 23725094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
Wise M
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel in vitro approach to assess the fit of implant frameworks.
Abduo J; Bennani V; Lyons K; Waddell N; Swain M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jun; 22(6):658-63. PubMed ID: 21044168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of immediate loading of electroeroded screw-retained titanium fixed prostheses supported by tilted implant: a multicenter retrospective study.
Acocella A; Ercoli C; Geminiani A; Feng C; Billi M; Acocella G; Giannini D; Sacco R
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e98-108. PubMed ID: 22013945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early functional loading at 5 days for Brånemark implants placed into edentulous mandibles: a prospective, open-ended, longitudinal study.
Becker W; Becker BE; Huffstetlert S
J Periodontol; 2003 May; 74(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 12816303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retrievable metal ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with milled titanium frameworks and all-ceramic crowns: retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up.
Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Borges J; Almeida R
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 22339902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant-supported laser-welded titanium and conventional cast frameworks in the partially edentulous law: a 5-year prospective multicenter study.
Jemt T; Henry P; Lindén B; Naert I; Weber H; Wendelhag I
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 12956498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maintenance of implant-supported maxillary prostheses: a 2-year controlled clinical trial.
Katsoulis J; Brunner A; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 21691613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks.
Al-Fadda SA; Zarb GA; Finer Y
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 17455431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous mandible: a 15-year comparative follow-up study.
Ortorp A; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 18783415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible.
Ortorp A; Jemt T; Bäck T; Jälevik T
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 12737254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The one-model technique: a new method for immediate loading with fixed prostheses in edentulous or potentially edentulous jaws.
Biscaro L; Becattelli A; Poggio PM; Soattin M; Rossini F
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Jun; 29(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 19537470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
