These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24180013)

  • 1. Time to talk.
    Nature; 2013 Oct; 502(7473):593-4. PubMed ID: 24180013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving science through online commentary.
    Eagleman DM; Holcombe AO
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6935):15. PubMed ID: 12721598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Post-publication review could aid skills and quality.
    Gibson TA
    Nature; 2007 Jul; 448(7152):408. PubMed ID: 17653166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer-review system could gain from author feedback.
    Korngreen A
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7066):282. PubMed ID: 16292281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ratings games.
    Nature; 2005 Aug; 436(7053):889-90. PubMed ID: 16107794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why are people reluctant to join in open review?
    Liu SV
    Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1052. PubMed ID: 17597736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Communication: Use multimedia in grant applications.
    Doran MR; Lott WB; Doran SE
    Nature; 2014 Jan; 505(7483):291. PubMed ID: 24429618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Commitment to Gender Diversity in Peer Review.
    Narasimhan SD
    Cell; 2019 Sep; 179(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 31526486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The trouble with replication.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):344-7. PubMed ID: 16871184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discourse among referees and editors would help.
    Lahiri DK
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Harnessing value of dispersed critiques.
    Goldacre B
    Nature; 2011 Feb; 470(7333):175. PubMed ID: 21307921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. All parties on edge as NIH delays open-access briefing.
    Check E
    Nature; 2005 Jan; 433(7023):182. PubMed ID: 15662377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Making research accessible: National Institutes of Health (NIH) public access and PNAS open access policies.
    Cozzarelli NR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Apr; 102(15):5303. PubMed ID: 15809413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Science illustration: Picture perfect.
    Madhusoodanan J
    Nature; 2016 Jun; 534(7606):285-7. PubMed ID: 27284599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Training peer reviewers.
    Mackey DA
    Nature; 2006 Oct; 443(7113):880. PubMed ID: 17106961
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review: Matchmaker aims to cut journal shopping.
    Kraus RH
    Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7595):448. PubMed ID: 27008959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer review: recognition via year-end statements.
    van Loon AJ
    Nature; 2003 May; 423(6936):116. PubMed ID: 12736656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review: Close inspection.
    Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 2016 May; 533(7602):279-81. PubMed ID: 27200447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review: Revise rules on conflicts of interest.
    Žliobaitė I; Fortelius M
    Nature; 2016 Nov; 539(7628):168. PubMed ID: 27830803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Engage more early-career scientists as peer reviewers.
    Casado M
    Nature; 2018 Aug; 560(7718):307. PubMed ID: 30108357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.