242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24180303)
1. Fingermark evidence evaluation based on automated fingerprint identification system matching scores: the effect of different types of conditioning on likelihood ratios.
Alberink I; de Jongh A; Rodriguez C
J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 24180303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--modelling within finger variability.
Egli NM; Champod C; Margot P
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):189-95. PubMed ID: 16914278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Introducing a semi-automatic method to simulate large numbers of forensic fingermarks for research on fingerprint identification.
Rodriguez CM; de Jongh A; Meuwly D
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):334-42. PubMed ID: 22103733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of three minutiae.
Neumann C; Champod C; Puch-Solis R; Egli N; Anthonioz A; Meuwly D; Bromage-Griffiths A
J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1255-66. PubMed ID: 17199611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying the weight of fingerprint evidence through the spatial relationship, directions and types of minutiae observed on fingermarks.
Neumann C; Champod C; Yoo M; Genessay T; Langenburg G
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Mar; 248():154-71. PubMed ID: 25637956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance evaluation of automated fingerprint identification systems for specific conditions observed in casework using simulated fingermarks.
de Jongh A; Rodriguez CM
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Jul; 57(4):1075-81. PubMed ID: 22458701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--Modeling between finger variability.
Egli Anthonioz NM; Champod C
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Feb; 235():86-101. PubMed ID: 24447455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance Study of a Score-based Likelihood Ratio System for Forensic Fingermark Comparison.
Leegwater AJ; Meuwly D; Sjerps M; Vergeer P; Alberink I
J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):626-640. PubMed ID: 28168685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of any number of minutiae.
Neumann C; Champod C; Puch-Solis R; Egli N; Anthonioz A; Bromage-Griffiths A
J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jan; 52(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 17209910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Commentary on: Alberink I, de Jongh A, Rodriguez C. Fingermark evidence evaluation based on automated fingerprint identification system matching scores: the effect of different types of conditioning on likelihood ratios. J Forensic Sci 2014; 59(1):70-81.
Neumann C; Saunders CP
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):252-6. PubMed ID: 25585667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Modern statistical models for forensic fingerprint examinations: a critical review.
Abraham J; Champod C; Lennard C; Roux C
Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Oct; 232(1-3):131-50. PubMed ID: 24053874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The potential (negative) influence of observational biases at the analysis stage of fingermark individualisation.
Schiffer B; Champod C
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):116-20. PubMed ID: 16876354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative assessment of evidential weight for a fingerprint comparison. Part II: a generalisation to take account of the general pattern.
Neumann C; Evett IW; Skerrett JE; Mateos-Garcia I
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jan; 214(1-3):195-9. PubMed ID: 21885220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative evaluation of latent fingermarks with novel enhancement and illumination.
Lanahan M; Yoda M
Sci Justice; 2021 Sep; 61(5):635-648. PubMed ID: 34482944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Likelihood ratio data to report the validation of a forensic fingerprint evaluation method.
Ramos D; Haraksim R; Meuwly D
Data Brief; 2017 Feb; 10():75-92. PubMed ID: 27981197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integration of pore features into the evaluation of fingerprint evidence.
Anthonioz A; Champod C
J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 24148081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Beyond the ridge pattern: multi-informative analysis of latent fingermarks by MALDI mass spectrometry.
Francese S; Bradshaw R; Ferguson LS; Wolstenholme R; Clench MR; Bleay S
Analyst; 2013 Aug; 138(15):4215-28. PubMed ID: 23658933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatial analysis of corresponding fingerprint features from match and close non-match populations.
Abraham J; Champod C; Lennard C; Roux C
Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jul; 230(1-3):87-98. PubMed ID: 23153799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distribution of the minutiae in the fingerprints of a sample of the Spanish population.
Gutiérrez-Redomero E; Alonso-Rodríguez C; Hernández-Hurtado LE; Rodríguez-Villalba JL
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):79-90. PubMed ID: 21146337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring coherence of computer-assisted likelihood ratio methods.
Haraksim R; Ramos D; Meuwly D; Berger CE
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Apr; 249():123-32. PubMed ID: 25698513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
