These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24180443)

  • 1. Objective measurement of the therapeutic effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure versus oral appliance therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.
    Vanderveken OM; Braem MJ; Dieltjens M; De Backer WA; Van de Heyning PH
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Nov; 188(9):1162. PubMed ID: 24180443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reply: Objective measurement of the therapeutic effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure versus oral appliance therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.
    Phillips CL; Cistulli PA; Grunstein RR
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Nov; 188(9):1162-3. PubMed ID: 24180444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reply: Objective measurement of the therapeutic effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure versus oral appliance therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.
    White DP
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Nov; 188(9):1163-4. PubMed ID: 24180445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Continuous positive airway pressure versus the mandibular advancing splint: are they equally effective in obstructive sleep apnea management?
    White DP
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Apr; 187(8):795-7. PubMed ID: 23586381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ACP Journal Club. Mandibular advancement device and CPAP did not differ for health outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea.
    Stanbrook MB
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 Oct; 159(8):JC10. PubMed ID: 24126659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health outcomes of continuous positive airway pressure versus oral appliance treatment for obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial.
    Phillips CL; Grunstein RR; Darendeliler MA; Mihailidou AS; Srinivasan VK; Yee BJ; Marks GB; Cistulli PA
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Apr; 187(8):879-87. PubMed ID: 23413266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perspectives on the reduction in cardiovascular mortality with oral appliance therapy for patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea intolerant to continuous positive airway pressure.
    Vanderveken OM
    Respirology; 2013 Nov; 18(8):1161-2. PubMed ID: 23859713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oral appliance therapy versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
    Aarab G; Lobbezoo F; Hamburger HL; Naeije M
    Respiration; 2011; 81(5):411-9. PubMed ID: 20962502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the effects of continuous positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement devices on sleepiness in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea: a network meta-analysis.
    Bratton DJ; Gaisl T; Schlatzer C; Kohler M
    Lancet Respir Med; 2015 Nov; 3(11):869-78. PubMed ID: 26497082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Obstructive sleep apnea therapy.
    Hoekema A; Stegenga B; Wijkstra PJ; van der Hoeven JH; Meinesz AF; de Bont LG
    J Dent Res; 2008 Sep; 87(9):882-7. PubMed ID: 18719218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnoea: What can we expect?].
    Buiret G; Chidiac F
    Rev Mal Respir; 2020 Sep; 37(7):526-549. PubMed ID: 32636050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of positive airway pressure and oral appliance in mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea.
    Barnes M; McEvoy RD; Banks S; Tarquinio N; Murray CG; Vowles N; Pierce RJ
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2004 Sep; 170(6):656-64. PubMed ID: 15201136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mandibular advancement splints decrease blood pressure similarly as with continuous positive airway pressure in sleep apnea.
    Huynh NT
    Oral Dis; 2016 Jul; 22(5):348-9. PubMed ID: 26990783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adjustable thermoplastic oral appliance versus positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea.
    Banhiran W; Assanasen P; Nopmaneejumrudlers C; Nujchanart N; Srechareon W; Chongkolwatana C; Metheetrairut C
    Laryngoscope; 2018 Feb; 128(2):516-522. PubMed ID: 28714534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oral appliance in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.
    Machado Júnior AJ; Pauna HF; Crespo AN
    Sleep Med; 2017 Jun; 34():232-233. PubMed ID: 28291702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oropharyngeal collapse predicts treatment response with oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea.
    Ng AT; Qian J; Cistulli PA
    Sleep; 2006 May; 29(5):666-71. PubMed ID: 16774157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noncontinuous positive airway pressure therapies for obstructive sleep apnea.
    Jones SF; Brito V
    Semin Respir Crit Care Med; 2014 Oct; 35(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 25353106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with oral devices.
    Demko BG
    J Mass Dent Soc; 2008; 57(2):20-3. PubMed ID: 18705210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mandibular Advancement Device as a Comparable Treatment to Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
    Takaesu Y; Tsuiki S; Kobayashi M; Komada Y; Nakayama H; Inoue Y
    J Clin Sleep Med; 2016 Aug; 12(8):1113-9. PubMed ID: 27250814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term oral-appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: a cephalometric study of craniofacial changes.
    Doff MH; Hoekema A; Pruim GJ; Huddleston Slater JJ; Stegenga B
    J Dent; 2010 Dec; 38(12):1010-8. PubMed ID: 20831889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.