580 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24181980)
1. Reduced efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech.
Yi HG; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL387-93. PubMed ID: 24181980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nonnative audiovisual speech perception in noise: dissociable effects of the speaker and listener.
Xie Z; Yi HG; Chandrasekaran B
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114439. PubMed ID: 25474650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
Pinet M; Iverson P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: effects of talker-listener accent similarity.
Pinet M; Iverson P; Huckvale M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1653-62. PubMed ID: 21895102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
Liu C; Jin SH
Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring effectiveness of semantic cues in degraded English sentences in non-native listeners.
Shi LF
Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 24003982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Binding and unbinding the auditory and visual streams in the McGurk effect.
Nahorna O; Berthommier F; Schwartz JL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1061-77. PubMed ID: 22894226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of visual speech information on the intelligibility of English consonants produced by non-native speakers.
Kawase S; Hannah B; Wang Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1352. PubMed ID: 25190408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. English sentence recognition in speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native listeners.
Jin SH; Liu C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23145700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
Peng ZE; Wang LM
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.
Gosselin PA; Gagné JP
Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 21916790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The equivalence of acceptable noise level (ANL) with English, Mandarin, and non-semantic speech: a study across the U.S. and Taiwan.
Ho HC; Wu YH; Hsiao SH; Stangl E; Lentz EJ; Bentler RA
Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 23153252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporally pre-presented lipreading cues release speech from informational masking.
Wu C; Cao S; Wu X; Li L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):EL281-5. PubMed ID: 23556692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Expectations and speech intelligibility.
Babel M; Russell J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2823-33. PubMed ID: 25994710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Linguistic experience and audio-visual perception of non-native fricatives.
Wang Y; Behne DM; Jiang H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1716-26. PubMed ID: 19045662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utilization of visual information and listener strategies in intelligibility impairment related to bilateral facial paresis.
Keintz C
Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Dec; 13(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 21682545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The intelligibility of Lombard speech for non-native listeners.
Cooke M; Lecumberri ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1120-9. PubMed ID: 22894231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Audiovisual training is better than auditory-only training for auditory-only speech-in-noise identification.
Lidestam B; Moradi S; Pettersson R; Ricklefs T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):EL142-7. PubMed ID: 25096138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
