580 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24181980)
21. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing.
Chen F; Wong LL; Tahmina Q; Azimi B; Hu Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of speech modification on non-native listeners for matrix-style sentences.
Cooke M; García Lecumberri ML; Tang Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL151-7. PubMed ID: 25698043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
Stilp CE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Perceiving unstressed vowels in foreign-accented English.
Braun B; Lemhöfer K; Mani N
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):376-87. PubMed ID: 21303018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of acoustic fine structure cues on the recognition of auditory-only and audiovisual speech.
Meister H; Fuersen K; Schreitmueller S; Walger M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):3116. PubMed ID: 27369134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Visual speech information: a help or hindrance in perceptual processing of dysarthric speech.
Borrie SA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1473-80. PubMed ID: 25786958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Development of a test battery for evaluating speech perception in complex listening environments.
Brungart DS; Sheffield BM; Kubli LR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):777-90. PubMed ID: 25096112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Formant discrimination of speech and non-speech sounds for English and Chinese listeners.
Liu C; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):EL189-95. PubMed ID: 22979831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of talker variability on word recognition in non-native listeners.
van Dommelen WA; Hazan V
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1690-9. PubMed ID: 22978897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise.
Miller SE; Schlauch RS; Watson PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):435-43. PubMed ID: 20649237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Children's perception of nonnative-accented sentences in noise and quiet.
Bent T; Atagi E
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3985-93. PubMed ID: 26723352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cross-language specialization in phonetic processing: English and Hindi perception of /w/-/v/ speech and nonspeech.
Iverson P; Wagner A; Pinet M; Rosen S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL297-303. PubMed ID: 22088031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of noise and audiovisual cues on speech processing in adults with and without ADHD.
Michalek AM; Watson SM; Ash I; Ringleb S; Raymer A
Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53(3):145-52. PubMed ID: 24456181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of aging on audio-visual speech integration.
Huyse A; Leybaert J; Berthommier F
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):1918-31. PubMed ID: 25324091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.
Kilman L; Zekveld A; Hällgren M; Rönnberg J
Trends Hear; 2015 Apr; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of visual cues on top-down restoration of temporally interrupted speech, with and without further degradations.
Benard MR; Başkent D
Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():24-33. PubMed ID: 26117407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The importance of interaural time differences and level differences in spatial release from masking.
Glyde H; Buchholz JM; Dillon H; Cameron S; Hickson L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL147-52. PubMed ID: 23927217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
Jørgensen S; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
