These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24181984)

  • 1. Unexpected intensity changes in the ear canal during a F(0)-shifted feedback experiment.
    Tlumak AI; Szuminsky NJ; Shaiman S; Pratt SR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL413-9. PubMed ID: 24181984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term Average Speech Spectra of Postlingual Cochlear Implant Users.
    Yüksel M; Gündüz B
    J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):255.e19-255.e25. PubMed ID: 29329722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children.
    Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Real-ear output measures of ear level fluency devices.
    Stuart A; Butler AK; Jones SM; Jones TA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):413-8. PubMed ID: 23458475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex-related differences in vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalization.
    Chen Z; Liu P; Jones JA; Huang D; Liu H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):EL355-60. PubMed ID: 21218857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing one's own voice during phoneme vocalization--transmission by air and bone conduction.
    Reinfeldt S; Ostli P; Håkansson B; Stenfelt S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):751-62. PubMed ID: 20707445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Responses of Middle-Frequency Modulations in Vocal Fundamental Frequency to Different Vocal Intensities and Auditory Feedback.
    Lee SH; Fang TJ; Yu JF; Lee GS
    J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):536-544. PubMed ID: 28268129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audio-vocal responses elicited in adult cochlear implant users.
    Loucks TM; Suneel D; Aronoff JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Oct; 138(4):EL393-8. PubMed ID: 26520350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: contributions of static and dynamic spectral cues.
    Donaldson GS; Rogers CL; Cardenas ES; Russell BA; Hanna NH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3021-8. PubMed ID: 24116437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audio-vocal responses of vocal fundamental frequency and formant during sustained vowel vocalizations in different noises.
    Lee SH; Hsiao TY; Lee GS
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():1-6. PubMed ID: 25749240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compensatory responses to loudness-shifted voice feedback during production of Mandarin speech.
    Liu H; Zhang Q; Xu Y; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2405-12. PubMed ID: 17902874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simulating the effect of interaural mismatch in the insertion depth of bilateral cochlear implants on speech perception.
    van Besouw RM; Forrester L; Crowe ND; Rowan D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1348-57. PubMed ID: 23927131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: evidence for harmonic cancellation.
    Deroche ML; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2855-65. PubMed ID: 22087914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant.
    Lenarz T; James C; Cuda D; Fitzgerald O'Connor A; Frachet B; Frijns JH; Klenzner T; Laszig R; Manrique M; Marx M; Merkus P; Mylanus EA; Offeciers E; Pesch J; Ramos-Macias A; Robier A; Sterkers O; Uziel A
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of bone conduction skull transmission by hearing thresholds and ear-canal sound pressure.
    Reinfeldt S; Stenfelt S; Håkansson B
    Hear Res; 2013 May; 299():19-28. PubMed ID: 23422311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discrimination of intonation contours by adolescents with cochlear implants.
    Holt CM; McDermott HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):808-15. PubMed ID: 24053225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective quantification of earplug occlusion effect using external acoustical excitation of the mouth cavity.
    Le Cocq C; Laville F; Gargour C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):763-70. PubMed ID: 20707446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual adaptation to gender and expressive properties in speech: the role of fundamental frequency.
    Hubbard DJ; Assmann PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2367-76. PubMed ID: 23556602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential cue weighting in perception and production of consonant voicing.
    Shultz AA; Francis AL; Llanos F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL95-101. PubMed ID: 22894322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.